Here are the materials in Winnemem Wintu Tribe v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.), also known as Franco v. USFS:
131-1 USFS Motion for Summary J
133-1 Winnemem Wintu Tribe Opposition
134 Winnemem Wintu Tribe Motion to Strike
Here are the materials in Winnemem Wintu Tribe v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.), also known as Franco v. USFS:
131-1 USFS Motion for Summary J
133-1 Winnemem Wintu Tribe Opposition
134 Winnemem Wintu Tribe Motion to Strike
Here are several documents recently released:
Hopi Settlement Agreement and Release
2016 03 11 -Press Release re Settlement with Flagstaff FINAL COPY
News coverage:Â SETTLEMENT TABLED —Â Flagstaff Council tables Hopi snowmaking settlement
We posted materials on the underlying case here.
Here are the materials in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States (D. N.M.):
34 Laguna Construction Co Motion to Dismiss
36 Laguna Pueblo Motion to Dismiss
47 AR Response to Pueblo Motion
71 DCT Order Granting US Motion
73 DCT Order Partially Granting Pueblo Motion
75 DCT Order Denying LCC Motion
Complaint here.
Here:
Here is the opinion in Alaska Oil and Gas Assn. v. Jewell.
Jeanette Wolfley has published “Reclaiming A Presence in Ancestral Lands: The Return of Native Peoples to the National Parks” in the Natural Resources Journal.
Here is the abstract:
For Native peoples, sacred sites and other traditional cultural properties are of critical importance to the preservation of their culture, society, and overall tribal sovereignty. Often these traditional cultural resources are part of present day national park landscapes. Today, tribes have unprecedented opportunities to reclaim a presence on their aboriginal lands, and in turn the National Park Service has an opportunity to ensure that parks remain a sanctuary for the practice of native traditions by accommodating and prioritizing native interests in the implementation of Indian policies and government-to-government obligations. This Article provides an overview of the tribal-NPS relationship, a discussion of the National Park Service Indian policies, and the application of trust obligations to accommodate tribal interests in the national parks. This Article advocates that the National Park Service should prioritize tribal interests to enable tribal peoples to access aboriginal lands where timehonored traditions and practices are celebrated and life is renewed.
Here:
Here.
Here are the materials in Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. United States of America (D. Or.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.