Coverage here.
Opinion here.
Congrats, Gerald!
Here.
Before the Sault Tribe receives federal approval, the following questions need answers: Does MILCSA mandate that the secretary take into trust lands purchased with interest or other income from the Fund? If the land is purchased with principal from the Fund, will it be held in restricted fee by operation of law? Is the purchase of the Lansing property a consolidation or enhancement of landholdings, or other permissible use of the Fund? Finally, the Sault Tribe will have to demonstrate that they will exercise governmental authority over the Lansing casino site. Given these complex issues, the Sault Tribe’s proposal is poised to set significant precedent in the evolving field of off-reservation gaming.
Gerald Carr is a third-year student in the Indigenous Law Program at Michigan State University College of Law. He holds a Ph.D. in Cultural Anthropology, specializing in the languages and cultures of Native North America.
Here is today’s Sixth Circuit opinion in Devlin v. Kalm.
An excerpt:
Plaintiff Patrick J. Devlin appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss based on the abstention doctrine and the court’s denial of Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. Plaintiff argues that his termination from the Michigan Gaming Control Board was retaliatory in violation of his First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986, and 1988 and his due process rights, after he made disparaging remarks to the press about the Michigan Attorney General and the application of the state’s gaming laws to Native American tribes.
Here are the materials in Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel v. Cal. Gambling Control Commission (S.D. Cal.):
Here.
Here are the recent materials:
News coverage here.
Here are the federal materials in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. Outsource Services Management, LLC (W.D. Wash.):
Nooksack First Amended Complaint
Here are the state appellate court briefs in Outsource Services Management v. Nooksack Business Corporation (Wash. App.):
Here is the article.
Here is the decision declining to act on the Class III compact between Graton Rancheria and the State of California:
Here is the decision opining on aspects of the compact negotiations between the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and the State of Arizona:
You must be logged in to post a comment.