Ninth Circuit Briefs in Chemehuevi Tribe v. Brown [gaming compact dispute]

Here:

Chemehuevi Opening Brief

California Answer Brief

Reply

Lower court materials here.

Texas Prevails over Alabam-Coushatta in Gaming Dispute

Here are the materials in State of Texas v. Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas (E.D. Tex.):

74 Texas Motion for Contempt

76 Tribe Motion to Set Aside Judgment

77 Texas Response to 76

80 Tribe Reply in Support of 76

96 Texas Motion for PI

99 Tribe Motion for Summary Judgment

100 Texas Opposition to 99

103 Tribe Response to 74

104 Tribe Response to 96

105 Tribe Reply in Support of 99

106 Texas Reply in Support of 74

107 Texas Reply in Support of 96

129 DCT Order

131 Tribe Motion to Stay

Federal Court Rejects Stockbridge-Munsee Effort to Restart Litigation against Ho-Chunk Nation Compact, Denies Motion for Sanctions

Here are the materials in Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of Wisconsin (W.D. Wis.):

76 motion to file amended complaint

78 wisconsin opposition

81 ho-chunk nation opposition

83 motion for sanctions

84 stockbridge-munsee reply

85 stockbridge-munsee opposition to motion for sanctions

88 dct order

Prior post here.

Ninth Circuit Denies En Banc Review of Ione Casino Challenges

Here are the materials in No Casino in Plymouth v. Zinke:

Ione adv No Casino – 9th Circuit – Order Denying No Casino Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc filed 01-11-2018

Ione Band Response [No Casino]

No Casino En Banc Petition

US Response [No Casino]

Here are the materials in County of Amador v. Dept. of Interior:

Ione adv Amador County – 9th Circuit – Order Denying County Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed 01-11-2018

Amador County En Banc Petition

Ione Band Response [Amador]

US Response [Amador]

Panel materials in both cases here.

 

 

Conn. and Tribes Sue Interior For Failure to Publish Gaming Compact Amendments

Here is the complaint in the matter of State of Connecticut et al v. Zinke et al, 17-cv-02564 (D.D.C. Nov. 29, 2017):

Doc. 1 – Civil Cover Sheet and Complaint

With the State of Connecticut, the Mohegan and Mashantucket Pequot Tribes have filed suit against the Secretary of Interior after the Department failed to treat submitted
amendments to their gaming compact as deemed approved and publish in the Federal Register notice that the amendments are deemed approved.

Federal Court Rejects Casino Opponent Demand to Supplement Administrative Record with Materials on the Legal Status of Trust Land (North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians)

Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):

22 motion to supplement record

25 interior response

26 reply

33 dct order

Comanche Effort to Shut Down Chickasaw Casino Fails for Now

Here are the materials in Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. Zinke  (W.D. Okla.):

13-1 Motion for PI

20 Response

26 Reply

33 DCT Order

Stockbridge-Munsee/Ho-Chunk Nation/Wisconsin Gaming Compact Dispute Dismissed as Moot

Here are the materials in Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of Wisconsin (W.D. Wis.):

8 motion for pi

27 state response

37 ho-chunk response

39 reply

57 ho-chunk motion for judgment on pleadings

58 stockbridge opposition

62 reply

67 dct order

Interior Prevails in Defense of Ione Band Trust Land Acquisition in Ninth Circuit

Here is the opinion in County of Amador v. Dept. of Interior. UPDATE: And the unpublished opinion in No Casino in Plymouth v. Zinke.

An excerpt:

This case involves a dispute over a proposed casino in Amador County, California. Plaintiff, the County of Amador (“County”), challenges a 2012 record of decision (“ROD”) issued by the United States Department of the Interior (“Interior”) in which the agency announced its intention to take land into trust for the benefit of the Ione Band of Miwok Indians (“Ione Band” or “Band”). The ROD also allowed the Ione Band to build a casino complex and conduct gaming on the land once it is taken into trust. Reviewing Interior’s decision under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), we conclude that the agency did not err. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s award of summary judgment to Interior and the Ione Band.

Briefs here.

Kansas v. NIGC Cert Petition

Here:

Cert Petition

Question presented:

Whether NIGC legal opinions that determine whether Indian lands are eligible for gaming under IGRA are reviewable final agency actions.

Lower court materials here.