Here is the opinion in Torgerson v. Torgerson:

Here are the materials in Hinton v. Cherokee Nation (D.D.C.):
16-1 Cherokee Nation Motion to Dismiss
28 Cherokee Nation Reply ISO 16

Here are the updated materials in Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Prior post here.

This paragraph is brutal:
The evidence presented to the Court at trial was “both overwhelming and extremely underwhelming.” (Tr. Court, 1426:20). Witness testimony was poignant at times, on one occasion moving some in the courtroom audience to tears. Ultimately, however, the Tribe failed to shoulder its burden of proof; and despite the Court’s serious misgivings about the treatment of the Tribe, the Tribe did not show that the United States’ failure to repair the crumbling Building violated trust obligations or constituted to a taking. Even if the Tribe met the elements of a breach of trust or takings claim, its proof of damages was entirely unconvincing, dependent on construction costs in the city limits of Chicago and rental values derived from cursory internet searches. Accordingly, the United States is entitled to judgment.
Here are new materials in Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (E.D. Mich.):
295 SCIT Third Motion for Default Judgment
Most recent post here.

Here are the materials in California Valley Miwok Tribe v. Haaland (D.D.C.):

Here are materials in Osage Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

Here are the materials in UNITE HERE v. Wilton Rancheria (E.D. Cal.):

Michael C. Blumm and Adam Eno have posted “Tribal Co-Management in the Biden Administration: Affirming a Commitment to Honor Tribal Voices on Ceded Lands” on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
Native American Tribes transferred to the United States more than two billion acres of land over a century-and-a-half, as the federal government acquired land for white settlement. The land cessions left the Tribes with just 2.6% of the homelands. Most of the land ceded was eventually settled, but a significant portion was not and is now managed as federal public lands under supervision of a variety of federal agencies. Today, the U.S. has some 640 million acres in federal land ownership, about 28% of the total lands of the country. The Biden administration has taken significant, unprecedented steps to involve tribes in the management of their ceded lands. Implementation of the Biden initiatives may revolutionize public land management, although the process of instituting Tribal consultation and co-management is still underway. This article explains the Biden efforts at co-management, highlighting several on-the-ground initiatives. The article maintains that a proper interpretation of the land cession agreements-consistent with the judicial canons of construction for federal agreements with Tribes-would conclude that the tribal conveyances to the U.S. included an implicit promise that ceded lands that failed to achieve the settlement purpose would be managed with Tribal participation, in order to ensure the protection of important Tribal cultural, subsistence, and economic resources. Although the Biden initiatives are a welcome beginning to fulfilling this neglected promise, since they are merely implementing what should be seen as an implicit servitude demanding a Tribal voice in their unsettled, ceded lands, they should not be reversible by a subsequent administration.

You must be logged in to post a comment.