The Indigenous People’s Journal of Law, Culture & Resistance is soliciting scholarly articles and student comments written about legal issues important to Indigenous communities in the United States and throughout the world, as well as works by artists that relate to or comment on legal issues. We also seek works on issues or aspects of life in Native communities that are impacted by law, whether tribal law or the laws of nation-states.
If you would like to submit a full-length submission for consideration, please email it to ipjlcr@lawnet.ucla.edu with the subject line “Volume VIII Submission” before January 15th, 2022. If you wish to submit an abstract first, please do so before December 15th, 2021.
Please follow all of these guidelines as applicable to your submission (e.g. a poem will not likely need Bluebook citations). Each submission should be sent as one Microsoft Word file with Bluebook formatted citations (21st ed. 2020). Brief bios are required, as well as 12 pt. Times New Roman typed font, paginated, and should include: your name, address, phone number, and email address in the header of the first page.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at <ipjlcr@lawnet.ucla.edu>.
UW Law’s Indian Law Symposium, an annual tradition for 34 years, will be held in two parts for the 2021-2022 academic year. Part 1 was held on Friday, October 1, 2021 and featured a full set of topics from panelists across the country.
Part 2 will be held on April 21 and 22, 2022 and will focus exclusively on the forthcoming Restatement of The Law of American Indians. The presenters will all be from the group of experts who participated in the drafting of the Restatement. The event will be cosponsored with the Washington Law Review and supported by the American Law Institute.
We will be requesting 13.5 Law & Legal CLE credits total for Part 2 of the 34th Annual Indian Law Symposium.
1. In view of Sherrill, whether New York tribes exercise “concurrent” jurisdiction over fee lands within the plenary taxing and regulatory authority of the state and local governments, thereby enabling those tribes to engage in gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), and cause the same or greater disruptions of settled expectations condemned by this Court in Sherrill.
2. Whether fee lands under plenary state and local taxation and regulation (per Sherrill) constitute “Indian lands” under IGRA because those lands are located within the Cayugas’ historic reservation.
3. Whether the Cayuga Nation’s ancient reservation was disestablished.
You must be logged in to post a comment.