Here are the briefs:
Oral argument video here:
Lower court materials here.
Update (4/8/24):
Check out “The Sovereignty Problem in Federal Indian Law” on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
There is a sovereignty problem in federal Indian law, namely, that the federal government’s sovereign defenses prevent tribal nations and individual Indian people from realizing justice in the courts. Often, compelling tribal and Indian claims go nowhere as the judiciary defers to the interests of the United States, even where Congress has expressly stated its support for tribal interests. Conversely, tribal judiciaries allow claims to proceed to the merits, invoking customary and traditional law to hold tribal governments accountable.
Sovereignty theory helps to explain why justice can be done in one court system but not another. But federal, state, and tribal courts are all American courts than can and should learn from one another. This paper is an effort to show that federal sovereign defenses are not inevitable, nor are they even necessary.

Here are the new materials in Eagle Bear Inc. v. Blackfeet Indian Nation (D. Mont.):

Prior post here.
Here are the materials so far in Shaff v. Claymore (D.S.D.):

Briefs here.
Here are the materials so far in Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP v. Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Utah (S.D. N.Y.):

Here are the materials in Eagle Bear Inc. v. Blackfeet Indian Nation (D. Mont.) (No. 22-93):
48 Eagle Bear Response to BIA Motion
50 Eagle Bear Response to Blackfeet
54 Blackfeet Response to Eagle Bear
56 Independence Bank Response to Blackfeet
59 Blackfeet Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of Bank Complaint
62 Blackfeet Response to Independence Bank
65 Blackfeet MSJ re Bank Count 1
68 Eagle Bear Reply in support of 23
70 Independence Bank Response to 59
71 Independence Bank Reply in support of 44
74 Independence Bank Response to 65
79 Blackfeet Reply in support of 65
82 BIA Motion to Dismiss Bank Complaint
84 Independence Bank Response to 82
93 Eagle Bear Motion to Conduct Further Discovery
98 DCT Order Granting Motion for Discovery
100 Eagle Bear Motion for Additional Discovery Time
102 Eagle Reply in support of 100
104 DCT Order Granting More Discovery Time
Prior post here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.