Here are the materials in State of Washington v. Shopbell (Wash. Ct. App. — Div. 1):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in State of Washington v. Shopbell (Wash. Ct. App. — Div. 1):
Prior post here.
Here:
Vol. 45, No. 1 (2020-2021)
Front Pages PDF
Article
ICWA’s Irony – Marcia Zug PDF
Comments
The Secretary of the Interior Has the Authority to Take Land into Trust for Federally Recognized Alaska Tribes – Meghan O’Connor PDF
“The Desert Is Our Home” – Kayla Molina PDF
Notes
Coeur D’alene Tribe v. Hawks: Why Federal Courts Have the Power to Recognize and Enforce Tribal Court Judgments Against Nonmembers “Because of the Federal Government’s Unique Relationship with Indian Tribes” – Heath Albert PDF
The Disproportionate Effect on Native American Women of Extending the Federal Involuntary Manslaughter Act to Include a Woman’s Conduct Against Her Child in Utero: United States v. Flute – Andie B. Netherland PDF
Special Feature
Mirrored Harms: Unintended Consequences in the Grant of Tribal Court Jurisdiction over Non-Indian Abusers – Jonathan Riedel PDF
Here is the opinion in Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Here are the materials in Pala Band of Mission Indians v. Maduros (S.D. Cal.):
Here is the opinion.
An excerpt:
This appeal comes after a seven year effort by the Department of the Interior (“Department”) to acquire land in trust on behalf of the Wilton Rancheria (“Wilton” or “Tribe”) to build a casino. After the Department finalized the acquisition of a parcel of land in Elk Grove, California, Stand Up for California! (“Stand Up”), Patty Johnson, Joe Teixeira, and Lynn Wheat (collectively “Appellants”) sued the Department. They brought a litany of claims, including claims that the Department (1) impermissibly delegated the authority to make a final agency action to acquire the land to an official who could not wield this authority, (2) was barred from acquiring land in trust on behalf of Wilton’s members, and (3) failed to adhere to its National Environmental Protection Act obligations when it selected the Elk Grove location. Appellants and the Department cross moved for summary judgment, and the District Court granted the Department’s motions on all counts. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the District Court.
Briefs here.
Here are the materials in Mohawk Gaming Enterprises LLC v. Affiliated FM Insurance Co. (N.D. N.Y.):
The complaint is here.
Here are the materials in Ksanka Kupaqa Xaʾⱡȼin v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (D. Mont.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.