Here.
This American Life Segment on Tribal Disenrollments
Here.
Here.
Here.
Here are the materials:
DCT Order Denying Motion But DismissingNAGPRA Claims
USFS Motion to Strike NAGPRA Claims
The court previously dismissed the tribe’s cultural property claims.
Here are the materials in Historic Eastern Pequots v. Salazar (D. D.C.):
DCT Order Dismissing Complaint
You may recall from our February post that a federal court had honored an arbitration provision in a Cashcall/Western Sky Financial form agreement and sent the case to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Court. That court responded to the plaintiff that the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe does not authorize arbitration under the American Arbitration Association rules, so the plaintiff successfully brought the case back to federal court.
Materials in Inetianbor v. Cashcall Inc. (S.D. Fla.) are here:
DCT Order Granting Motion to Reopen
Here is the opinion:
An excerpt:
Dori McGeshick, a tribal employee, helped administer a federal grant to build 11 new homes on a Native American reservation. Tasked with acquiring appliances for the new homes, McGeshick took the opportunity to improve her lifestyle, using federal funds to buy $13,000 worth of high‐end appliances for her own home. After a bench trial, the district court convicted her of the offense of theft by an employee of an Indian tribal government, see 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A), and sentenced her to 15 months’ imprisonment. On appeal McGeshick argues that the district court clearly erred when it found that she had abused a position of trust. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. Because she was entrusted with considerable discretion and responsibility, we affirm.
Here.
Looks like it’ll settle the land claims in exchange for gaming rights.
Here:
You must be logged in to post a comment.