Materials in Modoc Nation Suit against Former Business Partner, Softek

Here are the materials (so far) in Modoc Nation v. Shah (N.D. Okla.):

29 Amended Complaint

75 Motion to Dismiss Complaint

77 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims

82 Second Amended Counterclaims

93 Counterclaim Defendants MSJ

97 Response to 93

100 Response to 77

102 Tribe Response to 75

Pleadings (so far) in Insurance Company’s Effort to Avoid Navajo Nation District Court Jurisdiction

Here are the materials in Zurich American Insurance Company v. McPaul (D. Ariz.):

1 Complaint

1-2 Navajo Nation Complaint in Chinle D. Ct.

30 Zurich Motion for Summary J

32 Navajo Motion for Summary J

34 Zurich Response

35 Navajo Response

39 Zurich Reply

40 Navajo Reply

Innu Nation of Canada’s Opposition to Central Maine Power’s Transmission Line Permit

Here:

Innu Nation Press Release on CMP NE Clean Energy Connect

Fletcher on the Pandemic and Tribal Powers over Nonmembers

I posted a draft paper, “Indian Lives Matter: Pandemics and Inherent Tribal Powers,” on SSRN.

Here is the introduction to the paper:

America’s reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 is a microcosm of how Americans see the nation. It is a story of rugged individualism versus community needs. Many Americans insist on freedom to do as they please, rigorously pushing back on government. But in an environment where small numbers of individuals can easily transmit a deadly infection to others, creating the exponential increase in infections, rugged individualism is a terrible threat. Pandemics, luckily for humans, do not seem to occur all that frequently, but when they do occur, they can dramatically alter human history.

Indian people know all too well the impact of pandemics on human populations, having barely survived smallpox outbreaks and other diseases transmitted during the generations of early contact between themselves and Europeans. Indian people also suffered disproportionately from the last pandemic to hit the United States about a century ago. Some things have changed for the better for Indian people, namely tribal self-governance, but many things are not much better, including the public health situation of many Indian people.

Modern tribal governments navigate a tricky legal and political environment. While tribal governments have power to govern their own citizens, nonmembers are everywhere in Indian country, and the courts are skeptical of tribal authority over nonmembers. For example, after the Navajo Nation announced a 57-hour curfew for the weekend of April 10-13, 2020 (Easter weekend for many), the sheriff’s offices of Cibola and McKinley counties sent letters to the tribe insisting that the tribe refrain from citing nonmembers during the curfew, further insisting that nonmembers are governed more “fully” by the Governor of the State of New Mexico. Further, the fact that it is the county sheriff’s offices – and not counsel for the nonmembers – sending the letters is a deeply consequential signal to the tribal government. Of course, allowing nonmembers freedom to flout the tribe’s curfew defeats the purpose of the curfew. During a pandemic, the limitations on powers of tribal government could lead to tragedy.

This short essay is designed to lay down the argument favoring tribal regulatory powers over nonmembers in Indian country during a pandemic. It should be an easy argument, but federal Indian law makes it more complicated than it should be.

Here are some of the primary source documents noted in the paper:

Cibola county letter

McKinley County Sheriff Letter

The_Sacramento_Bee_Mon__Oct_28__1918_

Continue reading

Discovery Dispute in Mille Lacs Reservation Boundaries Case

Here are the non-sealed materials in Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. County of Mille Lacs (D. Minn.):

96 Tribe Motion to Quash

110 Tribe Opposition to Motion to Compel

130 Magistrate Report

Prior post here.

Seventh Circuit Oral Argument in Wisconsin Oneida Reservation Boundaries Case

Here.

Briefs here.

SCOTUS Will Hear McGirt Argument Remotely in May — No Date Set Yet

Here.

McGirt background materials here.

MHA Nation Member Wins Challenge to Secretarial Election Disenfranchising Off-Reservation Voters

Here are the materials in Hudson v. Zinke (D.D.C.):

32 Amended Complaint

35-1 Hudson MSJ

38 US MSJ

40 Hudson Reply

42 US Reply

53 DCT Order

61ibia253

64ibia010

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Issues Three Decisions in Disputes between Microsoft and St. Regis Mohawk Tribe

Here:

IPR2018-01594 FD

IPR2018-01601 Final Written Decision

IPR2018-01605 Final Written Decision

Briefs in one of the cases:

IPR2018-01594 – POs Preliminary Response

IPR2018-01594 Reply to Patent Owner_s Preliminary Response 2.28.19 FINAL

IPR2018-01594 – Patent Owners Sur-Reply