Here:
12th Annual Northwest Gaming Law Summit Brochure
Here is the opinion in Chavez v. Morongo Casino Resort & Spa:
Here:
26 US Cross Motion for Summary J
Also:
27-1 Fond du Lac Proposed Amicus Brief
The City’s motion is here.
Here is the complaint in State of New Mexico v. Jewell (D. N.M.):
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D. N.M.) referenced in the complaint:
11 Pueblo of Pojoaque Motion for Default Judgment
15 New Mexico Response to Motion for Default Judgment
18 Pueblo of Pojoaque Response
21 DCT Order Setting Aside Default Judgment
We posted the complaint in that case here.
Here are the briefs in Cosentino v. Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians:
Repky brief TK
Lower court materials (C.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Jamul Action Committee v. Stevens (E.D. Cal.):
22 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Fiile Amicus Brief
22-1 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Dismiss
30 Jamul Action Committee Response to Jamul Indian Village
31 Jamul Action Committee Response to Feds
34 Jamul Indian Village Reply in Support of Amicus Motion
36 Jamul Indian Village Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
42-1 Jamul Action Committee Motion to Amend Complaint
We posted the complaint here.
Here:
CA6 Order Vacating and Remanding
The court held moot the Saginaw Chippewa motion for abeyance.
Materials here.
Here are the materials so far in Sun v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming Enterprise (D. Conn.):
Here is an excerpt from the complaint:
On or about December 24, 2011, plaintiff Cheung Yin Sun, along with two other playing partners, plaintiffs Long Mei Fang and Zong Yang Lei, deposited approximately $1.6 million dollars in shared front money with defendant Foxwoods Resorts Casino in order to play Mini-Baccarat (Exhibit A, 1). Plaintiffs won approximately $1.148 million in chips that evening while playing Mini-Baccarat on the graveyard shift. Plaintiffs won the $1.148 million honestly by using an advantage play strategy known as “edge sorting,” which will be described in more detail below. However defendants Foxwoods and Foxwoods Management refused to redeem the chips/winnings because they accused plaintiffs of cheating.
Updated materials:
22 Connecticut Motion to Dismiss
Docket entry 37:
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (doc. no. [22] ) and Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 31 ) are both granted absent objection because the plaintiffs have failed to take the necessary steps to establish the court’s personal jurisdiction as to any of the defendants. Accordingly the case is dismissed. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/29/2015. (Lewis, D) (Entered: 06/01/2015)
Here:
SCIT Surreply re NLRB Remand Motion [& In Support of Abeyance Motion]
(Now) complete briefing here:
Sag Chip Motion to Hold Appeal in Abeyance
You must be logged in to post a comment.