Here is the opinion in United Auburn Indian Community v. Brown.
Here is the unpublished opinion in Citizens for a Better Way v. Brown.
Here is the opinion in United Auburn Indian Community v. Brown.
Here is the unpublished opinion in Citizens for a Better Way v. Brown.
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D.N.M.):
60-nm-motion-to-dismiss-count-iv
65-nm-motion-to-modify-pi-order
71-motion-to-dismiss-counts-iii-iv
Prior posts here, here, and here.
Tenth Circuit materials here.
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
106-1-sufc-motion-for-summary-j
108-1-picayune-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j
111-1-north-fork-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j
Here are the materials in Franks Landing Indian Community v. National Indian Gaming Commission (W.D. Wash.):
Here are the materials in North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):
Prior order here.
Here are the materials in Jamul Action Committee v. Chaudhuri (E.D. Cal.):
127-1 Federal Motion to Dismiss
133-1 JAC Motion for Summary J
This case is on remand from the Ninth Circuit; those materials here.
Here are the materials in the matter of Navajo Nation et al v. Marsh et al, 15-cv-00799 (D. N.M. 2016):
Doc. 12 – Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 13 – Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 17 – McNeal Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 19 – Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 21 – Memorandum Opinion and Order
Link to previously posted complaint here.
Here is the opinion in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Schinnler (Fla. Ct. App.).
An excerpt:
Here, the tribe established that no resolution, ordinance or compact including a waiver of immunity was enforceable in 2009 when the plaintiff’s claim arose. The resolution (No. C–195–06) passed by the Tribal Council authorized the tribe to enter into the 2007 compact. While the 2007 compact provided a limited waiver of immunity, our supreme court held the compact invalid. Crist, 999 So.2d at 616. The tribe also provided an affidavit attesting that no waiver of sovereign immunity was in effect when the claim arose. The plaintiff did not rebut this affidavit, nor could she have done so.
There is no factual dispute. The trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it denied the tribe’s motion to dismiss. This harm is irreparable if immunity is not given its intended effect.
From mLive.com:
The Gun Lake Tribe of Pottawatomi Indians and the state of Michigan have agreed to split $21.7 million as a “partial settlement” of a dispute over the Michigan Lottery’s creation of online ticket sales and lottery terminals in social clubs.
You must be logged in to post a comment.