Pueblo of Pojoaque v. New Mexico Preliminary Injunction Order (Gaming Dispute)

Previous filings posted here.

31 Memorandum Opinion and Order

32 Preliminary Injunction

California Court of Appeals Decides Gaming Compact Dispute

Here is the unpublished opinion and assorted materials in San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians v. State (Cal. App.):

Unpublished Opinion

San Pasqual Opposition to State Motion for Summary J

San Pasqual Second Amended Complaint

California Court of Appeals Briefs in Stand Up for California v. State of California

Here:

North Fork Rancheria Opening Brief

California Answer Brief

Stand Up for California Answer Brief

North Fork Reply

Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico TRO Materials (Gaming Dispute)

Here:

23 Pojoaque Motion for TRO

24-1 Pojoaque Supplemental Memorandum

28 New Mexico Opposition

Complaint here.

Interior Prevails in Two Challenges to Ione Band Trust Acquisition

Here are the materials in No Casino in Plymouth v. Jewell (E.D. Cal.):

72-1 No Casino in Plymouth Motion for Summary J

77 Ione Band Motion to Strike

80 Opposition to 77

85 Ione Band Reply re 77

90-1 US Motion for Summary J

91-1 Ione Band Motion for Summary J

93 No Casino in Plymouth Opposition

93-2 No Casino in Plymouth Reply

94 US Reply

96 Ione Band Reply

100 DCT Order

Here are the materials in County of Amador v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):

65 County Motion for Summary J

82 Ione Band Motion for Summary J

84-1 US Motion for Summary J

85 County Reply

86 US Reply

87 Ione Band Reply

95 DCT Order

We posted on these cases earlier, here, here, and here.

Interior Prevails in Enterprise Rancheria Gaming Trust Acquisition Matter

Here are the materials in Citizens for a Better Way v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):

158 DCT Order on Motions to Strike

168 DCT Order

Briefs are here.

Tohono O’odham Nation against Arizona Dept. of Gaming Director to Proceed

Here are the materials in Tohono O’odham Nation v. Ducey (D. Ariz.):

3 TON Motion for PI

49 Governor-AG Motion to Dismiss

50 Ariz Dept of Gaming Motion to Dismiss

60 TON Response to 50

69 ADG Reply

70 Gov-AG Reply

80 TON Reply in Support of PI

Second Circuit Rules in Favor of Seneca Nation in Gaming Dispute

Here is the opinion in Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Chaudhuri:

CACGEC Opinion

The court’s syllabus:

The plaintiffs, organizations and individuals who oppose the operation of a casino on land owned by the Seneca Nation of Indians in Buffalo, New York, filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York against the National Indian Gaming Commission, its Chairman, the Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior, arguing that the National Indian Gaming Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously and abused its discretion in approving an ordinance that permitted the Seneca Nation to operate a class III gaming facility in Buffalo. The district court (Skretny, J.) dismissed the action, and the plaintiffs appealed. We hold that the Seneca Nation’s lands in Buffalo are gaming‐eligible under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721, as “Indian lands” under the Seneca Nation’s jurisdiction and that IGRA Section 20’s prohibition of gaming on trust lands acquired after IGRA’s enactment, 25 U.S.C. § 2719(a), does not apply. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

Briefs here.

Lower court materials here.

Navajo Nation Sues to Stop State Court Jurisdiction over Personal Injury Lawsuits Arising at Navajo Casinos

Here is the complaint in Navajo Nation v. Marsh (D. N.M.):

1 Complaint

Edit: Amended Complaint

Eleventh Circuit Rules in Favor of Poarch Band in Gaming Dispute with Alabama

Here is the opinion in State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming Authority.

Briefs are here.