Previous filings posted here.
IGRA
California Court of Appeals Decides Gaming Compact Dispute
Here is the unpublished opinion and assorted materials in San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians v. State (Cal. App.):
California Court of Appeals Briefs in Stand Up for California v. State of California
Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico TRO Materials (Gaming Dispute)
Interior Prevails in Two Challenges to Ione Band Trust Acquisition
Here are the materials in No Casino in Plymouth v. Jewell (E.D. Cal.):
72-1 No Casino in Plymouth Motion for Summary J
91-1 Ione Band Motion for Summary J
93 No Casino in Plymouth Opposition
93-2 No Casino in Plymouth Reply
Here are the materials in County of Amador v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
65 County Motion for Summary J
Interior Prevails in Enterprise Rancheria Gaming Trust Acquisition Matter
Here are the materials in Citizens for a Better Way v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
158 DCT Order on Motions to Strike
Briefs are here.
Tohono O’odham Nation against Arizona Dept. of Gaming Director to Proceed
Here are the materials in Tohono O’odham Nation v. Ducey (D. Ariz.):
49 Governor-AG Motion to Dismiss
Second Circuit Rules in Favor of Seneca Nation in Gaming Dispute
Here is the opinion in Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Chaudhuri:
The court’s syllabus:
The plaintiffs, organizations and individuals who oppose the operation of a casino on land owned by the Seneca Nation of Indians in Buffalo, New York, filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York against the National Indian Gaming Commission, its Chairman, the Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior, arguing that the National Indian Gaming Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously and abused its discretion in approving an ordinance that permitted the Seneca Nation to operate a class III gaming facility in Buffalo. The district court (Skretny, J.) dismissed the action, and the plaintiffs appealed. We hold that the Seneca Nation’s lands in Buffalo are gaming‐eligible under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721, as “Indian lands” under the Seneca Nation’s jurisdiction and that IGRA Section 20’s prohibition of gaming on trust lands acquired after IGRA’s enactment, 25 U.S.C. § 2719(a), does not apply. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
Briefs here.
Lower court materials here.
Navajo Nation Sues to Stop State Court Jurisdiction over Personal Injury Lawsuits Arising at Navajo Casinos
Eleventh Circuit Rules in Favor of Poarch Band in Gaming Dispute with Alabama
Here is the opinion in State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming Authority.
Briefs are here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.