Here:
85 Motion to Supplement Admin Record
92 Reply re Motion to Supplement
Prior post here.
Here are the materials so far in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (D. Mass.):
18 Massachusetts Motion to Remand
21 Opposition to Motion to Remand
An excerpt:
This lawsuit involves a dispute between the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and a federally recognized Indian tribe as to who has regulatory jurisdiction over civil gaming on Indian lands on Martha’s Vineyard. The Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe and related entities have taken steps to commence commercial gaming operations on tribal lands without a license from the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts contends that by doing so, the Tribe violated a 1983 settlement agreement that subject the lands in question to state civil and criminal jurisdiction. Count 1 of the complaint alleges breach of contract, and Count 2 seeks a declaratory judgment.
The Commonwealth filed suit in state court on December 2, 2013. On December 30, 2013, defendants removed the action to this Court on the basis of federal-question and supplemental jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1367. The Commonwealth has moved to remand the matter to state court. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.
Here are the updated materials in State of Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe (D. Idaho):
Prior briefs here.
Here:
2014 0611 Order Granting Petition for Rehearing En Banc
En banc petition here. Supporting amicus briefs here.
Lower court materials here.
Here is the complaint in Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. National Indian Gaming Commission (D.D.C.):
Here are the materials in State of Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe (D. Idaho):
15-1 Coeur d’Alene Tribe Motion to Dismiss
16 Coeur d’Alene Opposition to Motion for TRO
20 Shoshone-Bannock Motion to File Amicus Brief
28 DCT Order Granting Motion to File Amicus Brief
Here. Second story in the newscast.
You must be logged in to post a comment.