Update in Stand Up for California v. Jewell

Here:

85 Motion to Supplement Admin Record

89 US Opposition

92 Reply re Motion to Supplement

Prior post here.

Update in City of Duluth v. NIGC

Here is Duluth’s motion for summary judgment:

25 Duluth Motion for Summary J

Prior materials here.

New Student Scholarship on Off-Reservation Gaming

The UNLV Gaming Law Journal has published “Fencing the Buffalo: Off-Reservation Gaming and Possible Amendments to Section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” (PDF).

 

Federal Court Finds Jurisdiction in Tribal Dispute with Massachusetts over Regulation of Gaming on Martha Vineyard

Here are the materials so far in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (D. Mass.):

1 Notice of Removal

18 Massachusetts Motion to Remand

21 Opposition to Motion to Remand

25-1 Massachusetts Reply

31 DCT Order

An excerpt:

This lawsuit involves a dispute between the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and a federally recognized Indian tribe as to who has regulatory jurisdiction over civil gaming on Indian lands on Martha’s Vineyard. The Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe and related entities have taken steps to commence commercial gaming operations on tribal lands without a license from the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts contends that by doing so, the Tribe violated a 1983 settlement agreement that subject the lands in question to state civil and criminal jurisdiction. Count 1 of the complaint alleges breach of contract, and Count 2 seeks a declaratory judgment.

The Commonwealth filed suit in state court on December 2, 2013. On December 30, 2013, defendants removed the action to this Court on the basis of federal-question and supplemental jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1367. The Commonwealth has moved to remand the matter to state court. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.

Federal Court Sends Coeur d’Alene Tribe Poker Dispute to Arbitration

Here are the updated materials in State of Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe (D. Idaho):

33 Coeur d’Alene Tribe Reply

35 DCT Order

Prior briefs here.

Ninth Circuit Grants En Banc Review in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California

Here:

2014 0611 Order Granting Petition for Rehearing En Banc

En banc petition here. Supporting amicus briefs here.

Lower court materials here.

Clinton White House Papers Release — Seminole Tribe v. Florida & Other Indian Matters

Here (PDF). Interesting stuff, especially the memorandum by now-Justice Elena Kagan starting on page 4.

 

Fort Sill Apache Sues NIGC — New Mexico Gaming Lands

Here is the complaint in Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. National Indian Gaming Commission (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

1-2 Exhibit 1 Part 1

1-3 Exhibit 1 Part 2

1-4 Exhibit 1 Part 3

1-5 Exhibit 2

Materials (So Far) in Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Texas Hold ‘Em Poker Dispute

Here are the materials in State of Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe (D. Idaho):

3-1 Idaho Motion for TRO

15-1 Coeur d’Alene Tribe Motion to Dismiss

16 Coeur d’Alene Opposition to Motion for TRO

20 Shoshone-Bannock Motion to File Amicus Brief

25 Idaho Reply

28 DCT Order Granting Motion to File Amicus Brief

 

National Native News Podcast; Includes Segment on Bay Mills

Here. Second story in the newscast.