Here are the materials in Canadian St. Regis Mohawk Tribe v. State of New York (N.D. N.Y.):
New York Federal Court Rules in Favor of Mohawk Land Claims
treaty rights
Court of Federal Claims Dismisses Bad Men Clause Suit over Sexual Abuse Perpetrated by Stanley Weber
Here are the materials in Red Cloud v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Tribal Brief in Michigan Public Service Commission Case Involving Enbridge Line 5
Mille Lacs Reservation Boundaries Intact
Here is the opinion in Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. County of Mille Lacs (D. Minn.):
Briefs here.
Minnesota Federal Court Declines to Dismiss Mille Lacs Band Suit against County Attorney and Sheriff after Remand from Eighth Circuit
Here are the updated materials in Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. County of Mille Lacs (D. Minn.):
292 CA8 Order Dismissing Appeal
305 County Sheriff Motion to Dismiss
Prior post here.
Grist: “Do salmon have rights?”
Here.
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Upper Skagit v. Sauk-Suiattle [U.S. v. Washington subproceeding 20-01]
Here:
220429 Answer Brief of Appellees Upper Skagit
220429 Answer Brief of Intervenor-PL-Appellee Swinomish
Samish Indian Nation v. Washington Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
- Whether Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity and tribal sovereign immunity deprived the lower courts of subject-matter jurisdiction over the Snoqualmie Indian Tribe’s claim, requiring dismissal on that ground under United States Supreme Court precedent including Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1996).
- Whether, under United States Supreme Court precedent including Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574 (1999) and Sinochem Int’l Co. v. Malaysia Intern. Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422 (2007), an issue preclusion dismissal is a merits dismissal and excluded from the threshold grounds among which a federal court may choose to dismiss a case before establishing its subject-matter jurisdiction.
- Whether, under United States Supreme Court precedent including Sinochem Int’l Co. v. Malaysia Intern. Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422 (2007), jurisdictional issues in this case were not “arduous” or “difficult to determine” because the lower courts could readily determine that they lacked jurisdiction, such that those courts committed reversible error in bypassing determination of their subject-matter jurisdiction and proceeding to dismiss the case instead with prejudice on issue preclusion grounds.
Lower court materials here.
Idaho Federal Court Dismisses Northwestern Shoshone Hunting Rights Claim
Here are the materials in Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation v. State of Idaho (D. Idaho):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.