Here is the complaint in United States v. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel (S.D Cal.):
Posts with materials in the related suit by the State of California are here and here.
Here are the new materials in materials in State of California v. Iipay Nation Of Santa Ysabel (S.D. Cal.):
SY Interactive Memo Opposing TRO motion
Appendix A — Memo opposing TRO motion + attachment
Declaration — David Chelette + exhibits Part 1 corrected
Declaration — David Chelette + exhibits Part 2
Vialpando Declaration + exhibits part 1
Vialpando Declaration + exhibits part 2
The complaint and TRO motion is here.
Here is the opinion in Amador County v. Dept. of Interior.
An excerpt:
In 2005, Amador County, California brought suit against the Department of Interior challenging the Secretary’s approval of a gaming compact between the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians (the “Tribe”) and the State of California. After nearly six-and-a-half years of litigation, the Tribe sought to intervene for the limited purpose of moving to dismiss the amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. The district court denied the motion as untimely, and this appeal followed. Because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
Briefs and lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in State of California v.Iipay Nation Of Santa Ysabel (S.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):
55 State Response to Motion to Dismiss
58 Soo Tribe Response to Motion for Relief
63 DCT Order to Adjourn and Reschedule Oral Argument
Sixth Circuit materials are here.
Here:
Lower court materials here.
Here is “Indian Gaming: Preliminary Observations on the Regulation and Oversight of Indian Gaming.”
It’s in the news here.
Here is the opinion in Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Brown:
We don’t have all the briefs, but here is what we do have:
NP Fresno Land Acquisitions Brief
You must be logged in to post a comment.