United States Files Complaint against Santa Ysabel over Internet Gaming

Here is the complaint in United States v. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel (S.D Cal.):

1 Complaint

Posts with materials in the related suit by the State of California are here and here.

Iipay Nation Responsive Pleadings in Internet Gaming Matter

Here are the new materials in materials in State of California v. Iipay Nation Of Santa Ysabel (S.D. Cal.):

SY Interactive Memo Opposing TRO motion

Appendix A — Memo opposing TRO motion + attachment

Declaration — David Chelette + exhibits Part 1 corrected

Declaration — David Chelette + exhibits Part 2

Vialpando Declaration + exhibits part 1

Vialpando Declaration + exhibits part 2

The complaint and TRO motion is here.

D.C. Circuit Rejects Bid by Buena Vista Rancheria to Intervene in Challenge to Trust Acquisition

Here is the opinion in Amador County v. Dept. of Interior.

An excerpt:

In 2005, Amador County, California brought suit against the Department of Interior challenging the Secretary’s approval of a gaming compact between the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians (the “Tribe”) and the State of California. After nearly six-and-a-half years of litigation, the Tribe sought to intervene for the limited purpose of moving to dismiss the amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. The district court denied the motion as untimely, and this appeal followed. Because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

Briefs and lower court materials here.

California Sues Iipay Nation Of Santa Ysabel over Internet Gaming

Here are the materials in State of California v.Iipay Nation Of Santa Ysabel (S.D. Cal.):

1 Complaint

3-1 TRO Motion

Updated Materials in Michigan v. Sault Tribe — State Seeks to Sue Tribal Officials

Here are the materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):

49 Renewed Motion to Dismiss

53-1 State Motion for Relief

55 State Response to Motion to Dismiss

57 Soo Tribe Reply

58 Soo Tribe Response to Motion for Relief

60 State Reply

63 DCT Order to Adjourn and Reschedule Oral Argument

Sixth Circuit materials are here.

 

Second Circuit Briefs in Citizens against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Hogen (FINAL)

Here:

Final CACGEC Principal Brief

Final Federal Brief

Final Seneca Amicus Brief

Final CACGEC Reply Brief

Final Federal Reply Brief

Lower court materials here.

Ninth Circuit Briefs in State of Arizona v. Tohono O’odham Nation

Here:

Arizona Brief

Salt River & Gila River Brief

TON Answer Brief

Arizona Reply Brief

Salt River & Gila River Reply Brief

Lower court materials here.

 

Ninth Circuit Briefs in State of Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe

Here:

Coeur d’Alene Tribe Opening Brief

Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Amicus Brief

State Brief

Tribe Reply

Oral argument audio, video.

Lower court materials here, here, here, and here.

GAO Report on the Regulation of Indian Gaming

Here is “Indian Gaming: Preliminary Observations on the Regulation and Oversight of Indian Gaming.”

It’s in the news here.

California COA Holds that Governor’s Concurrence under IGRA Does Not Trigger CEQA Review

Here is the opinion in Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Brown:

Chukchansi v Brown

We don’t have all the briefs, but here is what we do have:

California Brief

California DOT Brief

Madera City Brief

Madera County Brief

NP Fresno Land Acquisitions Brief