From all of us at TT, this rocks. Here.
“Opinion: We Disrupted The Harvard–Yale Game Because Our Schools Profit From Disaster”
From all of us at TT, this rocks. Here.
From all of us at TT, this rocks. Here.
Here are the briefs (so far) in Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in JW Gaming Development LLC v. James (N.D. Cal.):
129 Tribal Motion for Summary J
Prior posts here.
UPDATE:
Here is the opinion in State v. Leal (Ariz. Ct. App.):
An excerpt:
Defendant Carlos Leal appeals a restitution order requiring him to pay $5,500 in funeral expenses for a man he shot and killed in a bar. Leal does not challenge his murder conviction or resulting prison sentence. He does not argue the funeral expenses were unreasonable or unpaid. Instead, because the restitution award went to the Quechan Indian Tribe, rather than to a member of the victim’s family, Leal argues the order was fundamental error. Because Leal has shown no error, the restitution order is affirmed.

The American Indian Law Journal, published by the Seattle University School of Law, serves as a vital online resource providing high quality articles on issues relevant to Indian law practitioners and scholars across the country. The American Indian Law Journal accepts articles and abstracts on Indian Law for consideration from students, practitioners, tribal members, and law school faculty members.
The American Indian Law Journal is currently
accepting submissions for potential publication
in the spring 2020 issue.
Submission Deadline:
Spring issue January 5, 2020
Article submissions are accepted through Scholastica, BePress, and AILJ@seattleu.edu. The editing process for publication begins soon after these deadlines for each respective issue. The American Indian Law Journal respectfully requests that authors please use footnotes rather than endnotes. All footnotes must conform to the 20th edition of The Bluebook.
For more information or to submit an article, please contact Phoebe Millsap, Content Editor, millsapp@seattleu.edu.
Here.
Here are the materials so far in Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribal Court of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (D. Utah):
20-motion-for-immediate-release.pdf
46-tribe-motion-to-dismiss.pdf
53-reply-in-support-of-motion-for-release.pdf
54-reply-in-support-of-mtd.pdf
77-response-to-motion-for-atty-fees.pdf
Here are the materials so far in Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. Lake County Board of Commissioners (D. Mont.):
20 County Counter-Motion for PI
Here is the unpublished decision in McCoy v. Salish Kootenai College.
Briefs here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.