Here:
Lower court materials here.
Here.
An excerpt:
At my school, it took dozens of students elevating each other’s voices and alumni’s threat to withhold thousands of dollars in donations before the school considered breaking the precedent. It took each of us sharing heartbreaking personal narratives, demanding the public and the administration look into our wounds directly for administrators to be great lawyers who could understand the purpose of the old precedent (to help foster a diverse and inclusive educational environment) and create new methods of achieving that purpose, including saying publicly that Black Lives Matter and sharing the Black Law Student Association’s demands with students and alumni to drive accountability.
Here.
Here is the complaint in Cayuga Nation v. United States (D.D.C.):
Here is the complaint in St. Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Juul Labs, Inc. (N.D. Cal.):
Here is the complaint in Pala Band of Mission Indians v. Juul Labs, Inc. (N.D. Cal.):
Here is the complaint in Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Juul Labs, Inc. (N.D. Cal.):
Here is the complaint in Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. Juul Labs, Inc. (N.D. Cal.):
Here.
Here is the order in Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Munchkin (D.D.C.):
More materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.