Here:
North Fork Rancheria Opposition Brief
UPDATE 12/12/18): Reply
Cert petition here.
Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California (S.D. Cal.):
30-1 State Motion to Dismiss + Strike
36-1 State X Motion for Summary J
Here are the materials in State of Connecticut v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
18 Interior Motion for Partial Dismiss
23 Plaintiffs Opposition to 11
32 Interior Reply in Support of 18
Here are the materials in Forest County Potawatomi Community v. United States (D.D.C.):
79-1 Forest County Motion for Summary J
Prior posts here.
Here:
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept.of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
37 north fork rancheria motion for summary j
39 north fork opposition to 29
41 interior motion for summary j
46 sufc opposition to motions for summary j
51 north fork reply in support of 37
Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
36-1 club one casino motion for summary j
Prior post here.
Here:
Questions presented:
1. This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community.
2. This case presents the question whether multiple Indians residing on the same reservation are, per se, an “Indian tribe” irrespective of the individual Indians‘ tribal affiliations, if any.
Lower court materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.