Here are the materials in Jamul Action Committee v. Stevens (E.D. Cal.):
22 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Fiile Amicus Brief
22-1 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Dismiss
30 Jamul Action Committee Response to Jamul Indian Village
31 Jamul Action Committee Response to Feds
34 Jamul Indian Village Reply in Support of Amicus Motion
36 Jamul Indian Village Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
42-1 Jamul Action Committee Motion to Amend Complaint
We posted the complaint here.
The California Legislature has till the end of August 2014 to decide on two bills that would regulate online poker. Both bills are backed by different interest groups, including various tribes. The bills are AB 2291 and SB 1366.
Additionally, the Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel, CA is moving forward on an online poker site with the intention of adding real money play soon. This will be an interesting development to keep an eye on and could help set the legal landscape for future tribal online gaming.
Check out this brief blog post on the Iipay Nation’s online poker site: Here
Here:
The Honorable Paul A. Gosar
Representative-United States House of Representatives
The Honorable Raul M. Grijalva
Representative-United States House of Representatives
The Honorable Kevin Washburn
Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs-United States Department of the Interior
View Testimony
Mr. Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri
Vice Chairman-National Indian Gaming Commission
View Testimony
Ms. Anne-Marie Fennell
Director-Natural Resources and Environment-United States Government Accountability Office
View Testimony
The Honorable A.T. Stafne
Representative-United States House of Representatives
View Testimony
The Honorable Michell Hicks
Principal Chief-Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
View Testimony
Mr. Ernest L. Stevens, Jr.
Chairman-National Indian Gaming Association
View Testimony
The Honorable Diane Enos
Chairman-Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation
View Testimony
The Honorable Ned Norris, Jr.
Chairman-Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona
View Testimony
The Honorable Jerry Weiers
Mayor-City of Glendale
View Testimony
Here are the materials in State of Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation (W.D. Wis.):
An excerpt:
The state of Wisconsin has brought this case to enjoin defendant Ho–Chunk Nation from offering electronic poker at Ho–Chunk Gaming Madison (formerly DeJope), the Ho–Chunk Nation’s gaming facility in Madison, Wisconsin. The question raised in the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment is whether Ho–Chunk Nation’s poker game violates a compact with the state. The answer to that question turns on whether electronic poker qualifies as a “class II” or “class III” game under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Class III games are prohibited by the compact except under certain conditions not present in this case, but class II games are permitted. Because I conclude that Ho–Chunk Nation’s electronic poker game is a class III game, I am granting the state’s motion for summary judgment and denying Ho–Chunk Nation’s motion.
Here are updated materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):
53-1 Michigan Motion to Revise DCT Order Dismissing Tribal Officials
55 Michigan Response to Motion to Dismiss
Sault Tribe’s motion is here.
Here:
Oklahoma Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills
Tribal Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills
The Tenth Circuit previously abated this matter pending the outcome in Michigan v. Bay Mills.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.