Ninth Circuit Briefs in Maverick Gaming Appeal [updated with oral argument video]

Here are the briefs in Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States:

Lower court materials here and here.

Ninth Circuit Rejects Lummi’s U&A Fishing Claims

Here is the opinion in Swinomish Indian Community v. Lummi Nation.

Briefs here. Lower court materials here.

Lexington Insurance Co. v. Smith [Suquamish] Ninth Circuit Oral Argument Video

Briefs here.

Ninth Circuit Affirms No Casino in Plymouth v. NIGC [Ione Band]

Here is the unpublished opinion.

Briefs:

Lower court materials here.

Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Pro Se ICRA Suit Brought by Terminated Employee

Here is the unpublished opinion in Villasenor v. Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians.

The tribe’s brief:

Ninth Circuit Rejects Effort to Stop Lithium Mine in Nevada

Here is the unpublished opinion in Western Watersheds Project v. McCullough. And same for the Bartell Ranch/Burns Paiute case.

Selected briefs:

Lower court materials here.

Split Ninth Circuit Panel Rejects Klamath Irrigation District’s Forum Shopping Efforts Designed to Thwart Bureau of Reclamation’s Release of Water for Tribal Purposes

Here are the materials in In re Klamath Irrigation District:

Opinion

Ninth Circuit Briefs in Constitutional Challenge to MCA as Unjustified Racial Classification

Here are the briefs in United States v. Gordon:

Ok, so there’s only that brief so far. Also, since the defendant stipulated to tribal membership with Nez Perce, I doubt this has legs, but it’s the kind of full-throated attack on the Indian status cases arising under the Indian country criminal jurisdiction statutes that we should expect more regularly — i.e., the kind that relies a LOT on single-authored concurrences and dissents from a certain SCT Justice that tends to rely on discredited historical research.

Here’s the lower court judgment (nothing terribly helpful here since the defendant stipulated to tribal membership):

Miigwetch, Onion people!

Klamath Irrigation District v. Bureau of Reclamation Cert Petition [Rule 19 & Tribal Immunity]

Here:

Question presented:

Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder.

Lower court materials here.

Jaune Smith

Ninth Circuit Rules against Sauk-Suiatte in U&A Matter

Here is the opinion in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiatte Indian Tribe.

Briefs and so on here.

Jaune Smith — it’s as if I took a lot of close-up shots at a Whitney exhibition of her work. . . .