Becker v. Ute Indian Tribe Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

Whether a federal court may force a non-consenting, non-Indian plaintiff to exhaust his claims in tribal court when the defendant tribe has expressly consented by contract to federal or state court jurisdiction and waived both sov- ereign immunity and tribal exhaustion.

Whether a state court may adjudicate a contractual dispute between a tribe and a non-Indian where the tribe has provided specific contrac- tual consent to state court jurisdiction; or in- stead, whether the Constitution or laws of the United States prohibit such exercises of state court jurisdiction unless the State has assumed general civil jurisdiction over tribal territory under Sections 1322 and 1326 of Title 25.

Circuit split?

Lower court materials here.

Update:

FBA Indian Law Conference Day 1 Morning Panels

Ian Gershengorn, Stacy Leeds, Dan Lewerenz
Ann Marie Bledsoe Downes, Bryan Newland, Heather Dawn Thompson, Rose Petoskey

Manoomin Supplemental Brief in White Earth Nation Tribal Court

Here:

Prior post here.

California COA Reverses Yavapai-Apache Nation v. La Posta Band of Diegueño Mission Indians

Here are the materials:

Tenth Circuit Briefs in State of Kansas ex rel. Schmidt v. Dept. of the Interior

Here:

Lower court materials here.

Wyandotte removal trail.

Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Pro Se Suit by Cherokee Freedmen Descendant for Damages Arising from Slavery

Here is the opinion in Jarvis v. United States.

Wisconsin Federal Court Rejects Enbridge Demand to Depose Bad River Council Members “Thought Processes”

Here are materials in Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Inc. (W.D. Wis.):

Prior post here.

Maryland Appellate Court Holds Chickasaw-Owned Business Not Subject to State Taxation

Here is the opinion in A+ Government Solutions LLC v. Controller of Maryland:

This place just exudes sexiness.

Massachusetts Federal Court Declines to Dismiss Suit against Tribal Lending Business Partner

Here are the materials in Duggan v. Martorello (D. Mass.):