Here are the briefs in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers:
Members of Congress Amicus Brief
States Against DAPL Amicus Brief
States Supporting DAPL Amicus Brief
Oral argument audio here.
Lower court materials here.
Here are the briefs in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers:
Members of Congress Amicus Brief
States Against DAPL Amicus Brief
States Supporting DAPL Amicus Brief
Oral argument audio here.
Lower court materials here.

I will be presenting on my paper “Indian Lives Matter: Pandemics and Inherent Tribal Powers.”
My presentation materials are here.
Here are the materials in Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. F.D. (D. Utah):
A related case, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. B.N. (D. Utah), is stayed:
2-2 Window Rock DCT Order on Motion to Dismiss
Our prior post on the first order to exhaust is here.
Here.
Here is the complaint in Perank v. United States (D. Utah):
Here are the briefs in La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La Posta Reservation v. Trump:
And the oral argument video:
Here are the lower court materials.
Here are the materials.
Here.
Here is the opinion in Smith v. Landrum (Mich. Ct. App.):
An excerpt:
The question presented in this quiet title action is whether a state court has subject-matter jurisdiction to decide an easement dispute in favor of a non-Indian on land owned by a non-Indian when the land is located on an Indian reservation. The trial court concluded that it did not, and therefore entered a final order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(4) (lack of subject-matter jurisdiction).1 For the reasons outlined below, we hold that the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the easement dispute. We therefore reverse the order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition, and remand for further proceedings.
You must be logged in to post a comment.