Here are the additional materials in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (D. Mass.):
207 Tribe Motion to Stay Judgment
Prior post here.
IGRA
MGM Sues Interior over Off-Rez Gaming in Connecticut
Here is the complaint in MGM Resorts Global Development LLC v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
Native Village of Eklutna Sues Interior over Gaming-Related Denial
Here is the complaint in Native Village of Eklutna v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
Interior & Spokane Tribe Prevail over Spokane County & Kalispel Tribe re: Spokane Casino
Here are the materials in Kalispel Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Wash.):
We posted the complaint here.
Summary Judgment Motions in Stand Up v. Interior [Wilton Rancheria]
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
57 Motion to Supplement Record
62 DCT Order Denying Motion to Supplement Record
80 DCT Order Denying Second Motion
91 Stand Up Motion for Summary Judgmen
Prior post here.
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior [No. 18-16830]
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior [Challenge to IRA Section 5]
Federal Judge Issues Final Judgment for Town of Aquinnah on Remand from First Circuit
Here are the materials in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (D. Mass.):
181 Town Motion for Final Judgment
Readers might recall that the circuit instructed the district court to “ent[er] judgment in favor of the Tribe” (link to panel materials here). Here is the district court’s answer to that order:
In summary, the Tribe could have appealed those portions of the judgment that provided that it must comply with state and local permitting and other regulatory requirements. Instead, it only appealed those portions addressing gaming issues. An amended final judgment in favor of the Tribe as to the gaming issues is of course required. The remainder of the judgment, however, will be reinstated in substance. If the Tribe seeks to construct and operate a gaming facility, it need not comply with state and local gaming laws, but it must comply with all state and local laws and regulations of general applicability to the construction and operation of a commercial building.
Federal Court Dismisses California Tribes’ Card Rooms Exclusivity Complaint
Here are the materials in Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation v. Newsom (E.D. Cal.):
11-1 California Gaming Assn Motion to Intervene
11-5 Proposed Motion to Dismiss
21 Tribes Opposition to Motion to Intervene
22 State Opposition to Motion to Intervene
26 Tribe Opposition to State Motion to Dismiss
Prior post here.
Seneca Nation Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award Favoring State of New York on Revenue Sharing
Here are the materials in Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York (W.D. N.Y.):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.