Here:
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Here are the materials in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (D. Mass.):
181 Town Motion for Final Judgment
Readers might recall that the circuit instructed the district court to “ent[er] judgment in favor of the Tribe” (link to panel materials here). Here is the district court’s answer to that order:
In summary, the Tribe could have appealed those portions of the judgment that provided that it must comply with state and local permitting and other regulatory requirements. Instead, it only appealed those portions addressing gaming issues. An amended final judgment in favor of the Tribe as to the gaming issues is of course required. The remainder of the judgment, however, will be reinstated in substance. If the Tribe seeks to construct and operate a gaming facility, it need not comply with state and local gaming laws, but it must comply with all state and local laws and regulations of general applicability to the construction and operation of a commercial building.
Here are the materials in Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation v. Newsom (E.D. Cal.):
11-1 California Gaming Assn Motion to Intervene
11-5 Proposed Motion to Dismiss
21 Tribes Opposition to Motion to Intervene
22 State Opposition to Motion to Intervene
26 Tribe Opposition to State Motion to Dismiss
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York (W.D. N.Y.):
Here is the order in In re: Gaming Ordinance of Ponca Tribe of Nebraska:
Revised Amendment to FDO – Ponca NE
The earlier federal court materials are here.
Here is the opinion in Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of Wisconsin.
Briefs here.
Here is the opinion in Clay v. IRS (T.C.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.