Here are the materials in Cadet v. Snoqualmie Casino (W.D. Wash.):
Indian gaming
Second Circuit Briefs in Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York [gaming dispute arbitration award]
California SCT Briefs in United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. Newsom
S238544 – UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE AUBURN RANCHERIA v. NEWSOM
(Groban, J., not participating, Fybel, J., assigned justice pro tempore)
- Appellant’s Petition for Review
Filed on November 22, 2016 - Appellant’s Request for Judicial Notice
Filed on November 22, 2016 - Appellant’s Request for Judicial Notice
Filed on December 14, 2016 - Appellant’s Opening Brief on the Merits
Filed on March 27, 2017 - Appellant’s Request for Judicial Notice
Filed on March 28, 2017 - Respondent’s Answer Brief on the Merits
Filed on June 26, 2017 - Appellant’s Reply Brief on the Merits
Filed on August 23, 2017 - Amicus Curiae Brief of The Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California and The Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community
Filed on September 28, 2017 - Amicus Curiae Brief of Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians
Filed on October 10, 2017 - Amicus Curiae Brief of North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Filed on October 10, 2017 - Amicus Curiae Brief of Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria, California,
Filed on October 10, 2017 - Amicus Curiae Brief of Stand Up For California!
Filed on October 10, 2017 - Respondent’s Response to Amicus Curiae Brief
Filed on December 8, 2017 - Respondent’s Supplemental Brief
Filed on May 22, 2020
Ninth Circuit Rejects Two Challenges to North Fork Rancheria Gaming
SCOTUS Denies Cert in Noem v. Flandreau Santee Sioux Tax Case
Here is today’s order list.
Cert stage materials in Noem v. Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe.
Cert Petition in Oklahoma Gaming Machines Tax Case
Here is the petition in Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections v. Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.:
20200514142407520_Petition for Writ of Certiorari
20200514142428474_Appendix for Petition for Writ of Certiorari
Question presented:
Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test, see White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980), where the tax does not infringe on any federal regulatory purpose contained in the IGRA, the tax does not interfere with any tribal sovereignty interests, and the tax supports relevant and important government interests, such as law enforcement, schools and health services.
Lower court decision here.
UPDATE:
Oklahoma AG Opinion on Legality of Recent Gaming Compacts [updated]
New Outbreak at Lummi Might Be Warning to Tribes Getting Ready to Re-open Casinos
Here.
Eastern Band Cherokee Bid to Enjoin Catawba Trust Land Acquisition Fails
Here is the order in Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Fort Sill Apache Loses Akela Flats Suit against NIGC
Here is the order in Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. National Indian Gaming Commission (D.D.C.):
Materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.