Here are the materials in Cayuga Nation v. New York State Gaming Commission (N.D. N.Y.):
New York Federal Court Allows Cayuga Challenge to State Authorization of Games on Rez
Indian gaming
Minnesota Federal Court Dismisses Challenge to Prairie Island Indian Community Games
Here are the materials in North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie (D. Minn.):
53 Minnesota Tribes Amicus Brief
California Tribal Casinos Sues California Card Rooms under Tribal Access to Justice Act
Here is the amended complaint in Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Parkwest Bicycle Casino LLC (Cal. Super.):
Michigan Federal Court Dismisses Employment Suit against Hannahville Gaming Operation
Here are the materials in Parrotta v. Island Resort and Casino (W.D. Mich.):
Trio of Tribes Sue Interior over Koi Nation Gaming
Here is the complaint in Lytton Rancheria of California v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Federal Court Rejects Second Cow Creek Effort to Enjoin Coquille Gaming Project
Here are updated materials in Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.
Wintu and Paskenta Sue Interior over Redding Rancheria Gaming-Related Decisions
Here is the complaint in Wintu Tribe of Northern California v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Alaska Sues Interior over Native Village of Eklutna Gaming-Related Decisions
Here is the complaint in State of Alaska v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Materials (so far) in Challenge to Coquille Gaming Project
Here are the materials in Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
28 Motion to Disqualify Jenner
40-1 Coquille Opposition to Motion to Disqualify Jenner
51 Federal Opposition to TRO Motion
52 Coquille Opposition to TRO Motion
Jan. 22, 2025: MINUTE ORDER. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing held on this date, (1) Plaintiffs’ 28 Motion to Disqualify Keither Harper and Jenner & Block is denied; (2) Coquille’s 15 Motion to Intervene and 33 Renewed Motion to Intervene are granted; (3) Coquille’s 15 Motion to Expedite is denied as moot; and (4) the parties’ 40 , 41 motions to seal are denied and the Clerk of Court shall unseal those docket entries. Further, by January 24, 2025, Plaintiffs shall file all materials submitted for in camera review on the public docket. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 1/22/2025. (lcapm3) (Entered: 01/22/2025)
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.