The Native American Rights Fund has provided legal assistance to Tribes in Alaska since NARF’s founding in the early 1970s. In 1984, NARF opened an Alaska office so it could better serve Alaska Native Tribes and individuals. In the 40 years since NARF Alaska opened its doors, the office has litigated some of the most influential cases in the development of federal Indian law in Alaska. Below is an overview of the foundational work that NARF has done with and on behalf of Alaska Native Tribal governments and people.
sovereign immunity
Louisiana Appellate Court Rejects Claims of Serial Claimant against Chitimacha Tribe
Here is the unpublished opinion in Spivey v. Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana:
Related post here.
New York Federal (Again) Declines to Dismiss Cayuga Nation’s Suit against New York Gaming Agency
Here are the new materials in Cayuga Nation v. New York State Gaming Commission (N.D. N.Y.):
Prior post here.

Florida Federal Court Dismisses False Claims Suit against Miccosukee Gaming Operation
Here are the materials in Manzini v. Cypress (S.D. Fla.):

Fourth Circuit Decides Williams v. Martorello
Briefs on Whether Federal Trade Commission Act Abrogates Tribal Immunity
Sixth Circuit Briefs in Parrotta v. Island Resort and Casino [Hannahville]
Alaska Federal Court Rejects Effort to Attack Alaska Tribal Nations’ Federal Acknowledgment + Sovereign Immunity [Eklutna Gaming Operations]
Alabama Federal Court Dismisses Some Claims Against Fort Belknap Tribal Finance Company
Here are the materials in Weidley v. Aaniiih Nakoda Finance LLC (N.D. Ala.):






You must be logged in to post a comment.