Here are the materials in North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie (D. Minn.):
29 Prairie Island Motion to Dismiss
39 Mille Lacs Motion to Dismiss
89 Motion for Rule 59(e) Relief
Here is the order in State of California v. Del Rosa (E.D. Cal.):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Welsh v. Loudbear (D. Ariz.):
Here are relevant materials in Baker v. Axton (D. Idaho):
14 Opposition to Motion for Remand
15 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
16 Reply ISO Motion for Remand
The Native American Rights Fund has provided legal assistance to Tribes in Alaska since NARF’s founding in the early 1970s. In 1984, NARF opened an Alaska office so it could better serve Alaska Native Tribes and individuals. In the 40 years since NARF Alaska opened its doors, the office has litigated some of the most influential cases in the development of federal Indian law in Alaska. Below is an overview of the foundational work that NARF has done with and on behalf of Alaska Native Tribal governments and people.
Here is the unpublished opinion in Spivey v. Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana:
Related post here.
Here are the new materials in Cayuga Nation v. New York State Gaming Commission (N.D. N.Y.):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Manzini v. Cypress (S.D. Fla.):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.