Here is the opinion in Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. BNSF Railway Co.
Briefs here.
Here is “‘We Have to Stand Together’: A Tale of Two Nations.”
Here:
Witness List
Panel I
The Honorable Ned Norris, Jr. (testimony)
Chairman The Tohono O’odham Nation
Sells, AZ
Ms. Sarah Krakoff (testimony)
Moses Lasky Professor of Law
University of Colorado Law School
Boulder, CO
Ms. Shannon Keller O’Loughlin (testimony)
Executive Director
Association on American Indian Affairs
Rockville, MD
Mr. Steve Hodapp (testimony)
Retired Independent Contractor & Environmental Specialist
Lexington, VA
Panel II
Dr. Anna Maria Ortiz (testimony)
Director, Natural Resources and Environment
U.S. Government Accountability Office
Washington, D.C.
Mr. Scott Cameron (testimony)
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management, and Budget
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C.
Here are the materials in Gilbert v. Weahkee (D.S.D.):
19-3 Oglala Tribal Court Decision
Here.
Here is the complaint in Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Oral Argument Transcript:
Merits Briefs:
2020 03 20 McGirt Joint Motion for Divided Argument and Enlargement of Time
Amicus Briefs in Support of Petitioner:
2020 02 11 Amicus Brief Brad Henry et al
2020 02 11 Amicus Brief Historians Legal Scholars Cherokee Nation
2020 02 11 Amicus Brief National Ass’n Criminal Defense Lawyers
2020 02 11 Amicus Brief National Indigenous Women’s Resource Center et al
2020 02 11 Amicus Brief of Muscogee Creek Nation
18-9526tsacFormerUnitedStatesAttorneys
Amicus Briefs in Support of Respondent:
2020 03 20 Amicus Brief of United States
2020 03 20 Environmenal Fderation of Oklahoma, et al, Amicus Brief
2020 03 20 Int’l Municipal Lawers and Nat’l Sheriffs’ Assn Amicus Br
2020 03 20 Tulsa Merits Amicus Brief
Oklahoma District Attorneys Amicus Brief
Cert Stage Materials:
Please check out my new paper, “The Rise and Fall of the Ogemakaan,” now available on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Anishinaabe (Odawa, Bodewadmi, and Ojibwe) legal and political philosophy is buried under the infrastructure of modern self-determination law and policy. Modern Anishinaabe tribes are rough copies of American governments. The Anishinaabeg (people) usually choose their ogemaag (leaders) through an at-large election process that infects tribal politics with individualized self-interest. Those elected leaders, what I call ogemaakaan (artificial leaders) preside over modern governments that encourage hierarchy, political opportunism, and tyranny of the majority. While modern tribal governments are extraordinary successes compared to the era of total federal control, a significant number of tribes face intractable political disputes that can traced to the philosophical disconnect from culture and tradition.
Anishinaabe philosophy prioritizes ogemaag who are deferential and serve as leaders only for limited purposes and times. Ogemaag are true representatives who act only when and how instructed to do so by their constituents. Their decisions are rooted in cultural and traditional philosophies, including for example Mino-Bimaadiziwin (the act of living a good life), Inawendewin (relational accountability), Niizhwaaswii Mishomis/Nokomis Kinoomaagewinawaan (the Seven Gifts the Grandfathers or Grandmothers), and the Dodemaag (clans). I offer suggestions on how modern tribal government structures can be lightly modified to restore much of this philosophy.
Here:
You must be logged in to post a comment.