Here is the complaint in Town of Southhampton v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Here is the IBIA decision:
Federal Claims Court Dismisses Osage Headrights Trust Breach Suit
Here are new materials in Fletcher v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Tenth Circuit Holds Federal Court May Not Convict Indian Country Defendants with Lesser-Included Offenses Not Enumerated in Federal Statute
Here is the opinion in United States v. Hopson:
Briefs:
UNLV Gaming Law Journal Special Section on Indian Law
Here:
Editor’s Note
Valerie Andalibi-Alvarenga
Introduction
Danielle Finn
Beyond Bingo: How Class II Bingo-Based “Slot Machines” Are Reshaping Tribal-State Dynamics
Kelsey Henderson
Economic Development for Native Nevada: How Indian Gaming Can Further Tribal Self-Determination
Makai Zuniga
Keynote Speech from the 2025 Indian Nations Gaming & Governance Program Symposium
Patrice Kunesh
UCLA Law Review Symposium Issue — Red Rising: The Shifting Legal Landscape of Tribal Sovereignty
Here:
- Welcome to Red Rising: The Shifting Legal Landscape of Tribal Sovereignty
- Indigenous Peoples in International (Treaty) Diplomacyby Kristen A. Carpenter
- The Sovereignty Problem in Federal Indian Lawby Matthew L.M. Fletcher
- Homelands Not Graveyardsby M. Alexander Pearl
- Tribal Law Innovations in Native Governanceby Angela R. Riley
- “The Seed is the Law”: Creating New Governance Frameworks for Indigenous Heirloom Seeds and Traditional Knowledgeby Rebecca Tsosie & Michael Kotutwa Johnson
- Native Reproductive Self-Determinationby Lauren van Schilfgaarde
- Landback as Federal Policyby Kevin K. Washburn
Arizona Attorney Indian Law Issue
Here:
| Special Feature: Indian Law Intro |
| Should Tribes “Ban the Box”? |
| by: Katya Lancero Norris |
| Tribal Nations and the Use of AI |
| by: Angelo Baca & Katherine Belzowski |
| Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living in Indian Country |
| by: Judith M. Dworkin and Candace D. French |
| Tribal Programs Remain Intact Despite DEI Orders |
| by: Alexander Mallory |
| Tort Claims in Indian Country |
| by: Michael T. Combrink and Diana Elston-Miller |
Third Circuit Rejects Immunity Defense of Fork Belknap Sovereign Lending Company
UDub 38th Annual Indian Law Symposium (Sept. 4-5, 2025)
SCHEDULE PREVIEW
Thursday, Sept. 4
- Litigation and Federal Legislative Updates
- Keynote: Professor Kekek Stark (Turtle Mountain), Alexander Blewitt III School of Law, University of Montana
- Fish and the Future
- Mining and Transboundary Impacts
- Ethics: Maya Titova and Jaxi Sehorn, Staff Attorneys, Tribal Public Defense Clinic, Native American Law Center, UW School of Law
Friday, Sept. 5
- NEPA…Still?
- Keynote: Bryan Newland (Bay Mills), Powers, Pyles, Sutter & Verville, PC, Washington, DC
- The Mighty Columbia; Old Challenges, New Developments
More details here:
NARF’s Work in Alaska Over 40 Years
The Native American Rights Fund has provided legal assistance to Tribes in Alaska since NARF’s founding in the early 1970s. In 1984, NARF opened an Alaska office so it could better serve Alaska Native Tribes and individuals. In the 40 years since NARF Alaska opened its doors, the office has litigated some of the most influential cases in the development of federal Indian law in Alaska. Below is an overview of the foundational work that NARF has done with and on behalf of Alaska Native Tribal governments and people.
Utah Federal Court Declines to Allow Ute Tribe to Intervene in Federal Environmental Enforcement Action against Tribal Business Partner
Here are materials in United States v. Ovintiv USA Inc. (D. Utah)/United States v. Fourpoint Resources LLC (D. Utah):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.