Here.
Case materials here.


Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2022, Number of pages: 54 Posted: 08 Apr 2022, Accepted Paper Series, Jordan Gross, Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana
Michigan Law Review, Forthcoming, Number of pages: 24 Posted: 07 Apr 2022, Working Paper Series, Gregory Ablavsky, Stanford Law School
Washington Law Review, Forthcoming, Number of pages: 49 Posted: 05 Apr 2022, Working Paper Series, Robert J. Miller, Arizona State University (ASU) – Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law
Forthcoming, 11 Journal of Race, Gender and Ethnicity __, Number of pages: 21 Posted: 04 Apr 2022, Working Paper Series, Sara Ochs, University of Louisville – Louis D. Brandeis School of Law
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 23 Mar 2022, Working Paper Series, Michael C. Blumm and Dara Illowsky, Lewis & Clark Law School and Lewis & Clark College, Law School
Here:
Questions presented:
Whether a federal court may force a non-consenting, non-Indian plaintiff to exhaust his claims in tribal court when the defendant tribe has expressly consented by contract to federal or state court jurisdiction and waived both sov- ereign immunity and tribal exhaustion.
Whether a state court may adjudicate a contractual dispute between a tribe and a non-Indian where the tribe has provided specific contrac- tual consent to state court jurisdiction; or in- stead, whether the Constitution or laws of the United States prohibit such exercises of state court jurisdiction unless the State has assumed general civil jurisdiction over tribal territory under Sections 1322 and 1326 of Title 25.

Lower court materials here.
Update:


Here is the opinion in Jarvis v. United States.

Here are materials in Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Inc. (W.D. Wis.):

Prior post here.
Here is the opinion in A+ Government Solutions LLC v. Controller of Maryland:

You must be logged in to post a comment.