UW Indian Law Symposium – Virtual Format and New Agenda

California COA Rejects Allottees’ Claim to Tax Exemption from Riverside County

Here is the unpublished opinion in Albrecht v. County of Riverside:

Briefs:

Opening Brief

County Brief

Coachella Water District Brief

Desert Water Agency Brief

Reply

Federal Suit(s) Filed against Seminole Gaming Compact [updated]

Here are relevant materials in West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. Haaland (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

1-1 Seminole Compact

1-6 Interior Letter

Updates (10/14/21, 10/19/21, 10/21/21, 11/23/21)

13 Seminole Motion

19 WF Motion for Summary J

22 WF Opposition to 13

24 Seminole Reply in Support of 13

25 Federal Motion to Dismiss

28 Florida Amicus Brief

31 WF Opposition to Motion to Transfer

41 Interior Response

43 DCT Order

Here are materials in West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. DeSantis (N.D. Fla.):

1 Complaint

18 First Amended Complaint

21 Seminole Motion to Intervene and Dismiss

22 Desantis Motion to Dismiss

26 WF Response to 20

27 WF Response to 22

33 Desantis Reply in Support of 20

34 WF Motion for Summary J

Update (10/19/2021):

Here are materials in Monterra MF v. Haaland (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

31 Seminole Motion to Intervene

35 Federal Motion to Dismiss

36 Federal Motion to Transfer

37-4 Monterra MSJ

53 Interior Response

Prisoner Suit against Pokagon Tribal Police in their Individual Capacities Allowed to Proceed

Here are the materials in Hartsell v. Shaarf (N.D. Ind.):

20 Amended Complaint

34 Motion to Dismiss

35 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Dismisses Kickapoo Member’s Challenge to Federally Approved Wind Energy Project

Here are the materials in Mattwaoshshe v. United States (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

36-1 US Motion to Dismiss

38-1 Soldier Creek Wind Motion to Dismiss

39-1 Nextera Energy Motion to Dismiss

40-1 Westar Energy Motion to Dismiss

44 Opposition

48 Soldier Creek Opposition

49 Nextera Reply

50 Westar Reply

51 US Reply

60 DCT Order

Not that it would matter much in this issue, but I can’t help but point out of the more anomalously interpreted Indian law statutes of all time is briefly discussed in this opinion. Here is the law, 25 U.S.C. sec. 175:

In all States and Territories where there are reservations or allotted Indians the United States attorney shall represent them in all suits at law and in equity.

Seems pretty clear, eh? No chance. 🙂 Yet another example of the word “shall” being interpreted as the exact opposite of its meaning. . . .

News Coverage of Indian Law Issues (8/17/21) [More McGirt today]

Reuters: “Paul, Weiss inked $700K contract with Oklahoma to undo tribal rights ruling

Forbes: “Native Tribes And State Tax And Regulatory Authority: The Waters Remain Murky”

AZ Central: “Indigenous people find legal, cultural barriers to protect sacred spaces off tribal lands”

Axios: “Native American population jumps to largest size in modern history

Texas Observer: “Texas Draws Criticism With Plan to Lure Tourists to Sites Where Indigenous People Were Banished”

News Coverage of Indian Law Issues [McGirt, etc.]

NYTs: “Tribes’ Victory in Oklahoma at Risk in Bold Request to the Supreme Court

The Conversation: “The disturbing history of how conservatorships were used to exploit, swindle Native Americans”

CapTimes: “Q&A: UW Law student Michael Williams aims to help tribes with pursuit of law

New Republic: “Oklahoma Wants a Supreme Court Do-Over on Tribal Sovereignty

E&E News Greenwire: “How a big Alaska fishing case hooked a solicitor nominee”

Federal Court Dismisses Challenge to Wind Energy Project under Rule 19, Tribal Immunity

Here are materials so far in Backcountry Against Dumps v. Bureau of Indian Affairs (S.D. Cal.):

75-1 Tribe Motion to Dismiss

84 Opposition

87 Reply

93 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Manoomin v. Minnesota DNR Tribal Court Complaint re: Line 3

Here is the complaint in Manoomin v. Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources (White Earth Tribal Court):

manoomin-et-al-v-dnr-complaint-w-exhibits-8-4-21

Mary Annette Pember’s coverage on the suit is here.