Here.
HHS Offers $80M to Indian Country
Here.
Here.
Here.
Best material we’ve seen from Indian country so far. Here.
Here is the petition in Neff v. United States:
Questions presented:
1. Does a misrepresentation about the true identity of the owner of a business during settlement negotiations to resolve a civil lawsuit constitute a scheme to defraud the litigant of money or property in violation of the mail and wire fraud statutes?
2. Is the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity wholly inapplicable in a circumstance where payday loans are made by a Native American tribe in affiliation with an entity acting as an “arm of the tribe” where such loans are made at interest rates in excess of state regulations, thus rendering the loans ipso facto unlawful debts in violation of the RICO statute?
3. Does the government have to prove willfulness to establish a RICO conspiracy to collect an unlawful debt?Lower court materials here.
Here is the petition in Bales v. United States:
Question presented:
Whether, against the legal backdrop of Congress’s and this Court’s recognition of the primacy of state law to determine, quantify, and administer water rights, a federal court may deem federal agency regulatory action under the Endangered Species Act to constitute the adjudication and administration of water rights for tribal purposes.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Here is the complaint in Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
And here is the Interior decision:
Here is the order in Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation v. United States (D.D.C.):
Here are the materials in Snoqualmie Indian Tribe v. State of Washington (W.D. Wash.):
27-point-elliott-tribes-amicus-brief.pdf
We posted the complaint here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.