Here is the opinion in Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges v. Haaland.

Anchorage Daily News coverage.
Briefs:

Here is the opinion in Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges v. Haaland.

Anchorage Daily News coverage.
Briefs:

Here are the materials in Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Nason (D.D.C.):

53-1 Tribe Motion for Summary J
64 Federal Motion for Summary J


Here is the opinion in Grand Canyon Trust v. Provencio.
Briefs here.
Pollution here:

Here is the motion to dismiss in City of Seattle v. Sauk-Suiattle Tribal Court (W.D. Wash.):

Prior post here.
Here are the materials in National Wildlife Federation v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (N.D. Cal.):
74 Enviros Motion for Summary J
87-1 Red Cliff Ojibwe Amicus Brief
107 Federal Motion for Summary J
116 Enviros + Sault Tribe Amicus Brief

Here are the materials in City of Seattle v. Sauk-Suiattle Tribal Court (W.D. Wash.):

Tribal court suit here.
Coleen A. Fox, Nicholas J. Reo, Brett Fessell, and Frank Dituri have published “Native American Tribes and Dam Removal: Restoring the Ottaway, Penobscot and Elwha Rivers.“

The abstract:
Since the early 1900s, more than 1700 dams have been removed from rivers in the United States. Native American Tribes have played a key role in many significant removals, bringing cultural, economic, and legal resources to bear on the process. Their involvement contrasts with the displacement and marginalisation that have historically characterised the relationship between Native Americans and the dams built by settler – colonial governments on their rivers. Our research investigates Tribal involvement in dam removals, with examples from the Ottaway, Penobscot, and Elwha rivers. We ask the following: what roles have Tribes played in successful removals? How do dam removals affect and reflect shifting relations between Tribal governments and non-Tribal actors? Our research finds that Tribal involvement provides opportunities for inserting underacknowledged values and resource claims into dam removal efforts, and that it facilitates new collaborations and alliances. We also find evidence of Tribal involvement affecting the nature and practice of river restoration through dam removal. We conclude that the involvement of Tribes in dam removal contributes to important shifts in environmental politics in the US, and that it also creates opportunities for restorative environmental justice for Native Americans and their rivers.
HIGHLY recommended.



Here.
Briefs:
Here is the complaint in Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. City of Seattle (Sauk-Suiattle Tribal Court):
You must be logged in to post a comment.