Here:
24-1 Pojoaque Supplemental Memorandum
Complaint here.
gaming
Interior Prevails in Two Challenges to Ione Band Trust Acquisition
Here are the materials in No Casino in Plymouth v. Jewell (E.D. Cal.):
72-1 No Casino in Plymouth Motion for Summary J
91-1 Ione Band Motion for Summary J
93 No Casino in Plymouth Opposition
93-2 No Casino in Plymouth Reply
Here are the materials in County of Amador v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
65 County Motion for Summary J
Interior Prevails in Enterprise Rancheria Gaming Trust Acquisition Matter
Here are the materials in Citizens for a Better Way v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
158 DCT Order on Motions to Strike
Briefs are here.
California Court of Appeals Orders Depublication of Cosentino Opinion
Sixth Circuit Denies En Banc Petition in NLRB v. Little River Tribal Govt; Saginaw Chippewa En Banc Petition Remains Pending
Here is the order (Judge McKeague dissents):
CA6 Order Denying Rehearing En Banc
En banc materials in both cases here.
Tohono O’odham Nation against Arizona Dept. of Gaming Director to Proceed
Here are the materials in Tohono O’odham Nation v. Ducey (D. Ariz.):
49 Governor-AG Motion to Dismiss
BIA Issues Land into Trust Decision for Mashpee Wampanoag
Here.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs Kevin K. Washburn today issued a decision approving a request by the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe to acquire 170 acres of land into trust in the town of Mashpee, Mass., for tribal governmental, cultural and conservation purposes, and 151 acres in trust in the City of Taunton, Mass., for the purpose of constructing and operating a gaming facility and resort. The lands in both Mashpee and Taunton will become the tribe’s first lands held in trust.
Second Circuit Rules in Favor of Seneca Nation in Gaming Dispute
Here is the opinion in Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. Chaudhuri:
The court’s syllabus:
The plaintiffs, organizations and individuals who oppose the operation of a casino on land owned by the Seneca Nation of Indians in Buffalo, New York, filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York against the National Indian Gaming Commission, its Chairman, the Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior, arguing that the National Indian Gaming Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously and abused its discretion in approving an ordinance that permitted the Seneca Nation to operate a class III gaming facility in Buffalo. The district court (Skretny, J.) dismissed the action, and the plaintiffs appealed. We hold that the Seneca Nation’s lands in Buffalo are gaming‐eligible under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721, as “Indian lands” under the Seneca Nation’s jurisdiction and that IGRA Section 20’s prohibition of gaming on trust lands acquired after IGRA’s enactment, 25 U.S.C. § 2719(a), does not apply. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
Briefs here.
Lower court materials here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.