California COA Reverses Yavapai-Apache Nation v. La Posta Band of Diegueño Mission Indians

Here are the materials:

Tenth Circuit Briefs in State of Kansas ex rel. Schmidt v. Dept. of the Interior

Here:

Lower court materials here.

Wyandotte removal trail.

Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Pro Se Suit by Cherokee Freedmen Descendant for Damages Arising from Slavery

Here is the opinion in Jarvis v. United States.

Wisconsin Federal Court Rejects Enbridge Demand to Depose Bad River Council Members “Thought Processes”

Here are materials in Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Inc. (W.D. Wis.):

Prior post here.

MHA Nation moves to intervene in redistricting case in North Dakota.

The MHA Nation and individual Native American voters in North Dakota have filed a motion to intervene as defendants into a North Dakota District Court redistricting case.  The plaintiffs have sued the State to overturn a legislative subdistrict for the Fort Berthold Reservation.  The MHA Nation and tribal member intervenors are seeking to defend the Fort Berthold Reservation subdistrict that was approved by the North Dakota legislature.

Motion to intervene here:

Press release here.

Maryland Appellate Court Holds Chickasaw-Owned Business Not Subject to State Taxation

Here is the opinion in A+ Government Solutions LLC v. Controller of Maryland:

This place just exudes sexiness.

Massachusetts Federal Court Declines to Dismiss Suit against Tribal Lending Business Partner

Here are the materials in Duggan v. Martorello (D. Mass.):

Split Ninth Circuit Affirms Tribal Immunity in Banishment Case, Remands for Reconsideration of Section 1983 Claims against Tribal Officials

Here is the opinion in Oertwich v. Traditional Village of Togiak.

Togiak fish drying

Briefs here.

Albrecht v. County of Riverside Cert Petition [Leasing Regs + Taxation Preemption]

Here:

Lower court materials here.

Questions presented:

  1. Do the federal regulations governing the leasing of Indian lands preempt state and local governments
    from taxing the leasehold interest conveyed by the regulated leases?
  2. Does the express preemption provision of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934—which prohibits
    state taxes on “any interest in lands” that the government “acquire[s] pursuant to this Act … in trust
    for [an] Indian tribe or individual Indian”—apply when the government acquires extended trust rights
    pursuant to the Act?