The Native American Rights Fund has provided legal assistance to Tribes in Alaska since NARF’s founding in the early 1970s. In 1984, NARF opened an Alaska office so it could better serve Alaska Native Tribes and individuals. In the 40 years since NARF Alaska opened its doors, the office has litigated some of the most influential cases in the development of federal Indian law in Alaska. Below is an overview of the foundational work that NARF has done with and on behalf of Alaska Native Tribal governments and people.
Utah Federal Court Declines to Allow Ute Tribe to Intervene in Federal Environmental Enforcement Action against Tribal Business Partner
Here are materials in United States v. Ovintiv USA Inc. (D. Utah)/United States v. Fourpoint Resources LLC (D. Utah):
D.C. Circuit Decides Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. HHS
Louisiana Appellate Court Rejects Claims of Serial Claimant against Chitimacha Tribe
Here is the unpublished opinion in Spivey v. Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana:
Related post here.
Potawatomi Gathering Judicial Conference @ Gun Lake Tribe
New York Federal (Again) Declines to Dismiss Cayuga Nation’s Suit against New York Gaming Agency
Here are the new materials in Cayuga Nation v. New York State Gaming Commission (N.D. N.Y.):
Prior post here.
Sixth Circuit Decides GTB v. BCBS
Apache Women Sue US over Proposed Oak Flat Destruction
Red Cliff Ojibwe Sues 3M over PFAS
Here is the complaint in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. 3M (D.S.C.):
Ninth Circuit Reverses Gila River/San Carlos Apache Water Rights Victory
Here is the opinion in Gila River Indian Community v. Schoubroek.
Here are available briefs:
Lower court materials here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.