Here:
Editor’s Note
Valerie Andalibi-Alvarenga
Introduction
Danielle Finn
Beyond Bingo: How Class II Bingo-Based “Slot Machines” Are Reshaping Tribal-State Dynamics
Kelsey Henderson
Economic Development for Native Nevada: How Indian Gaming Can Further Tribal Self-Determination
Makai Zuniga
Keynote Speech from the 2025 Indian Nations Gaming & Governance Program Symposium
Patrice Kunesh
Here:
Here:
| Special Feature: Indian Law Intro |
| Should Tribes “Ban the Box”? |
| by: Katya Lancero Norris |
| Tribal Nations and the Use of AI |
| by: Angelo Baca & Katherine Belzowski |
| Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living in Indian Country |
| by: Judith M. Dworkin and Candace D. French |
| Tribal Programs Remain Intact Despite DEI Orders |
| by: Alexander Mallory |
| Tort Claims in Indian Country |
| by: Michael T. Combrink and Diana Elston-Miller |
SCHEDULE PREVIEW
Thursday, Sept. 4
Friday, Sept. 5
More details here:
The Native American Rights Fund has provided legal assistance to Tribes in Alaska since NARF’s founding in the early 1970s. In 1984, NARF opened an Alaska office so it could better serve Alaska Native Tribes and individuals. In the 40 years since NARF Alaska opened its doors, the office has litigated some of the most influential cases in the development of federal Indian law in Alaska. Below is an overview of the foundational work that NARF has done with and on behalf of Alaska Native Tribal governments and people.
Here are materials in United States v. Ovintiv USA Inc. (D. Utah)/United States v. Fourpoint Resources LLC (D. Utah):
Here is the unpublished opinion in Spivey v. Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana:
Related post here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.