Here are the materials in Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
We posted the complaint here.
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Court Rejects Defenses of Tunica-Biloxi’s Sovereign Lending Company
Here are the materials in Dunn v. Global Trust Management (M.D. Fla.):
13 Defendant Motions to Compel & for Judgment on Pleadings
And here are the materials in McIntosh v. Global Trust Management (M.D. Fla.):
24 Defendant Motion to Compel & for Judgment on Pleadings
US Amicus Brief in FMC Corp. v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Cal. Law Review Online Roundtable: Responding to “Politics, Indian Law, and the Constitution”
The article is here.
Arizona Tribes’ Amicus Brief in Arizona COA Tribal Taxation Case
Here is the brief in South Point Energy Center v. Arizona Department of Revenue (Ariz. Ct. App.):
Related case here.
Federal Claims Court Holds Osage Headright Owners’ Trust Claims Foreclosed by Osage Trust Settlement
Here are the materials in Fletcher v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
10-7 Wilson Pipestem Declaration
We posted the complaint here.
New Lawsuit to Stop Keystone XL
Here is the complaint in Indigenous Environmental Network v. Bureau of Land Management (D. Mont.):
New Scholarship on Taxing Indian Country Cannabis
Mark J. Cowan has posted “Taxing Cannabis on the Reservation,” forthcoming in the American Business Law Journal, on SSRN.
The abstract:
American Indian tribes that enter the cannabis industry confront a multi-sovereign tax system that lacks certainty and horizontal equity. The complex interaction of state legalization and taxation of cannabis, federal tax law, the status of tribes as both governments and business enterprises, and the legal and tax landscape in Indian country can give tribes tax advantages and disadvantages compared to off-reservation cannabis dispensaries. This article analyzes these tax issues, examines them in the context of prior challenges posed by Indian gaming, and suggests reforms that address the tax inequities that can result from cannabis sales on Indian reservations.
Update in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Dept. of the Interior
Here are updated materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
34 DCt Order on Supplementing Admin Record
37 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Motion for Reconsideration
40 DCT Order Denying Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Motion
Prior post here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.