Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Bernhardt (N.D. Okla.):
Prior post here.
Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Bernhardt (N.D. Okla.):
Prior post here.
Here:
Question presented:
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an Administrative Procedure Act action challenging a federal agency’s compliance with statutory requirements governing federal agency decisions, for failure to join a non-federal entity that would benefit from the challenged agency action and cannot be joined without consent.
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE:
Here is the order in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.):
More details later.
From the Conversation, here is “Tribal leaders face great need and don’t have enough resources to respond to the coronavirus pandemic.”
Here.
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit correctly holds that tribal jurisdiction over nonmembers is established whenever a Montana exception is met, or whether, as the Seventh and Eighth Circuits have held, a court must also determine that the exercise of such jurisdiction stems from the tribe’s inherent authority to set conditions on entry, preserve tribal self-government, or control internal relations.
2. Whether the Ninth Circuit has construed the Montana exceptions to swallow the general rule that tribes lack jurisdiction over nonmembers.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Here. An excerpt:
“Tribes are really just big families in a lot of ways,” said Matthew Fletcher, a law professor at Michigan State University. “The threats to your family are something you’re going to take seriously.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.