Here is the opinion in Mestek v. Lac Courte Oreilles Community Health Center:
Materials here.

Here are the materials in Tsosie v. NTUA Wireless LLC (D. Ariz.):

Here is the opinion in Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin.

Lower court materials here.
Here is the cursory, bloodless opinion in Mound v. United States.
Briefs here. Lower court materials here.
An excerpt:
In 2014, the Tribe identified a culvert—a structure that channels water under a road—as a potential maintenance project. In 2018, based on an engineering assessment, the Tribe decided to replace the culvert. Because its existing contract did not authorize funding for the project, the Tribe sought a new contract with the BIA. Before the new contract was finalized, heavy rains collapsed the culvert, leaving a large gap in the road. Four cars drove into the gap and plunged into the water. Trudy Peterson and James Vander Wal were swept downstream and died. Evan Thompson and Steven Willard suffered serious injuries.

Here is the opinion in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Manzini (Fla. Ct. App. 4th Dist.):

Here are the materials in Eagle Bear Inc. v. Blackfeet Indian Nation (D. Mont.) (No. 22-93):
48 Eagle Bear Response to BIA Motion
50 Eagle Bear Response to Blackfeet
54 Blackfeet Response to Eagle Bear
56 Independence Bank Response to Blackfeet
59 Blackfeet Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of Bank Complaint
62 Blackfeet Response to Independence Bank
65 Blackfeet MSJ re Bank Count 1
68 Eagle Bear Reply in support of 23
70 Independence Bank Response to 59
71 Independence Bank Reply in support of 44
74 Independence Bank Response to 65
79 Blackfeet Reply in support of 65
82 BIA Motion to Dismiss Bank Complaint
84 Independence Bank Response to 82
93 Eagle Bear Motion to Conduct Further Discovery
98 DCT Order Granting Motion for Discovery
100 Eagle Bear Motion for Additional Discovery Time
102 Eagle Reply in support of 100
104 DCT Order Granting More Discovery Time
Prior post here.

Here:
Question presented:
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder.
Lower court materials here.

Here are the materials in Dakota Metal Fabrication v. Parisien (D.N.D.):

Here is the unpublished order in Tule Lake Committee v. FAA:

You must be logged in to post a comment.