Here is the opinion in Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation.
Materials here.
Here:
The Native American Rights Fund is hiring. Learn more about the vacancies at the NARF website>
NARF also invites 3L law students, recent law school graduates, and those with judicial clerkships to apply for sponsorship for a post-graduate public interest fellowship. Skadden Fellowship deadline is July 9. Learn more>
We have scoured the web. Here are some of the latest materials related to Indian Law. Find all of the latest updates at https://narf.org/nill/bulletins/
U.S. Supreme Court Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2020-2021update.html
One petition for certiorari was denied on 6/21/21:
Federal Courts Bulletin
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html
State Courts Bulletin
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html
Tribal Courts Bulletin
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2021.html
U.S. Legislation – 117th Congress Bulletin
https://narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/117_uslegislation.html
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin (contact us if you need help finding a copy of an article)
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2021.html
News Bulletin
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html
This week, in brief:
Here are the materials so far in Lundy v. Balaam (D. Nev.):
Here is the order in JW Gaming Development LLC v. James (N.D. Cal.):
An excerpt:
Shortly after judgment was entered in this case, PPN constituted its Tribal Court for the first time; there is no evidence that it ever existed in any meaningful way until then. Days after the newly appointed judge issued standing orders, PPN filed a civil complaint in that Tribal Court that seeks to (1) declare the judgment issued in this case invalid, (2) limit and control—indeed, vitiate—the scope of enforcement of that judgment, and (3) impose roughly eleven million dollars in liability on JW Gaming for alleged fraud stemming from the same loan agreement here. The lawsuit names not only JW Gaming but its attorneys in this matter and the bank at which PPN maintains accounts that was recently subpoenaed in the course of enforcement of the judgment. It is the first (and, as far as the record shows, only) case brought in the Tribal Court. Remarkably, up until the eve of the hearing on a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against the proceeding, which I ultimately denied, JW Gaming could not find publicly available information about how appear in that proceeding (despite being served with a summons), who the judge was, or what the rules were.
JW Gaming moved for an order to show cause why an injunction should not issue, which I denied. It then moved for the TRO, which I converted into a motion for a preliminary injunction once PPN’s counsel committed to placing the Tribal Court proceeding on hold. That motion is now ripe for decision.
It is critical that federal courts respect tribal sovereignty and tribal court jurisdiction. Tribes are sovereign nations. Their ability to govern themselves and enjoy the full benefits of sovereignty is unquestioned. Tribal courts, as arms of the tribe, are entitled to substantial comity and deference under established federal law. I previously denied JW Gaming’s motion for an order to show cause why an injunction should not issue out of these concerns. I remain vigilant about the compelling interest that PPN has in maintaining its sovereignty.
Those concerns, however, do not prevent an injunction against a Tribal Court proceeding that seeks to invalidate or interfere with the judgment entered in this Court. There are compelling interests in ensuring that enforcement of valid federal-court judgments is not interfered with, that JW Gaming is not required to litigate a lawsuit precision-engineered to invalidate and interfere with this one, and that third parties are not exposed to court orders or liability for simply enforcing a judgment or attempting to comply with the procedures for enforcing it. To the extent the lawsuit seeks to invalidate the judgment or interfere with enforcement, it is unquestionably meritless: a tribal court lacks authority to invalidate a federal court’s judgments or to dictate the scope of executing that those judgments. JW Gaming has shown it is entitled to a preliminary injunction to the extent that the Tribal Court proceedings attempts to invalidate, interfere with, or thwart the judgment entered here. I possess jurisdiction to enter this injunction to protect and effectuate the judgment. The doctrine of tribal court exhaustion does not apply because PPN exercised its sovereign power to clearly, expressly, and unequivocally waive it.
Briefs and related materials here.
Here are the materials in Lewis Tein P.L. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida (Miami-Dade Cir. Ct.):
Prior post here.
Here is today’s order list.
Here are the cert stage briefs in Club One.
Every summer, the Native American Bar Association – DC (NABA-DC) organizes events and programs for summer interns interested in the field of Indian law and policy. The NABA-DC programs include the Brownbag Program and Mentorship Program. Through each program, interns will be able to meet and engage with professionals currently working in DC on issues impacting Indian Country.
The Brownbag program provides summer interns an opportunity to attend lunches hosted by offices such as government agencies, law firms, and non-profit organizations. For more information on the NABA-DC Brownbag Program, please contact nabadcbrownbag@gmail.com.
The mentorship program provides summer interns an opportunity to engage one-on-one with professionals in the DC Indian Law community. For more information on the NABA-DC mentorship program, please contact nabadcmentorship@gmail.com.
Students and summer interns may sign-up to participate in the summer programs here: https://forms.gle/v3vXjtkcJnr3DSE3A
Indian Country Professionals may sign-up to volunteer as a mentor here: https://forms.gle/voueFjKZZCPfcset7
From the Atlantic here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.